public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>,
	Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>,
	Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>,
	lvc-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dma-mapping: benchmark: fix node id validation
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 18:45:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39f5190b-5011-4584-9748-e6d0ee5d279a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240504114713.567164-4-pchelkin@ispras.ru>

On 2024-05-04 12:47 pm, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> While validating node ids in map_benchmark_ioctl(), node_possible() may
> be provided with invalid argument outside of [0,MAX_NUMNODES-1] range
> leading to:
> 
> BUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in map_benchmark_ioctl (kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c:214)
> Read of size 8 at addr 1fffffff8ccb6398 by task dma_map_benchma/971
> CPU: 7 PID: 971 Comm: dma_map_benchma Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6 #37
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
> Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117)
> kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:603)
> kasan_check_range (mm/kasan/generic.c:189)
> variable_test_bit (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:227) [inline]
> arch_test_bit (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:239) [inline]
> _test_bit at (include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142) [inline]
> node_state (include/linux/nodemask.h:423) [inline]
> map_benchmark_ioctl (kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c:214)
> full_proxy_unlocked_ioctl (fs/debugfs/file.c:333)
> __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:890)
> do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83)
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
> 
> Compare node ids with sane bounds first. NUMA_NO_NODE is considered a
> special valid case meaning that benchmarking kthreads won't be bound to a
> cpuset of a given node.

Makes sense, and the style of the check looks like a reasonably common 
pattern.

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).
> 
> Fixes: 65789daa8087 ("dma-mapping: add benchmark support for streaming DMA APIs")
> Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
> ---
>   kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c b/kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c
> index a6edb1ef98c8..9f6c15f3f168 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,8 @@ static long map_benchmark_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>   		}
>   
>   		if (map->bparam.node != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
> -		    !node_possible(map->bparam.node)) {
> +		    (map->bparam.node < 0 || map->bparam.node >= MAX_NUMNODES ||
> +		     !node_possible(map->bparam.node))) {
>   			pr_err("invalid numa node\n");
>   			return -EINVAL;
>   		}

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-10 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-04 11:47 [PATCH v2 0/4] dma-mapping: benchmark: fixes and error handling improvements Fedor Pchelkin
2024-05-04 11:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dma-mapping: benchmark: fix up kthread-related error handling Fedor Pchelkin
2024-05-10 17:35   ` Robin Murphy
2024-05-15 12:14     ` Fedor Pchelkin
2024-05-04 11:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dma-mapping: benchmark: avoid needless copy_to_user if benchmark fails Fedor Pchelkin
2024-05-10 17:52   ` Robin Murphy
2024-05-04 11:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] dma-mapping: benchmark: fix node id validation Fedor Pchelkin
2024-05-10 17:45   ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2024-05-04 11:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] dma-mapping: benchmark: handle NUMA_NO_NODE correctly Fedor Pchelkin
2024-05-07  6:56   ` Barry Song
2024-05-23 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] dma-mapping: benchmark: fixes and error handling improvements Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39f5190b-5011-4584-9748-e6d0ee5d279a@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=pchelkin@ispras.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox