From: Josue Emmanuel Amaro <Josue.Amaro@oracle.com>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Value of TASK_UNMAPPED_SIZE on 2.4
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 11:15:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A030EE2.92DC3F2@oracle.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 900 bytes --]
All,
TASK_UNMAPPED_SIZE is defined in include/asm-i386/processor.h as:
#define TASK_UNMAPPED_SIZE (TASK_SIZE / 3)
The value of TASK_SIZE is defined as PAGE_OFFSET which is set to 0xC0000000
(page.h). This works out to be a value of 0x4000000.
The question is:
Are there any negative side effects in defining TASK_UNMAPPED_SIZE to 0x1000000?
By doing this we allow a process to access more memory. On Oracle it allows us
to grow our buffer size from 1.7 GB to 2.4 GB improving overall performance by
reducing I/O.
Thanks in advance,
--
=======================================================================
Josue Emmanuel Amaro Josue.Amaro@oracle.com
Linux Products Manager Phone: 650.506.1239
Intel and Linux Technologies Group Fax: 650.413.0167
=======================================================================
[-- Attachment #2: Card for Josue Emmanuel Amaro --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 390 bytes --]
begin:vcard
n:Amaro;Josue Emmanuel
tel;cell:650-245-5131
tel;fax:650-413-0167
tel;work:650-506-1239
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.oracle.com
org:Intel and Linux Technologies
version:2.1
email;internet:Josue.Amaro@oracle.com
title:Sr.Product Manager - Linux
adr;quoted-printable:;;500 Oracle Parkway=0D=0AMS1ip4;Redwood Shores;CA;94065;United States
fn:Josue Emmanuel Amaro
end:vcard
next reply other threads:[~2000-11-03 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-03 19:15 Josue Emmanuel Amaro [this message]
2000-11-03 19:37 ` Value of TASK_UNMAPPED_SIZE on 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-04 7:39 ` Josue Emmanuel Amaro
[not found] <fa.d4dt9vv.1gm6abv@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ebii26v.1mgevrq@ifi.uio.no>
2000-11-03 20:27 ` Kai Harrekilde-Petersen
2000-11-03 20:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-03 22:36 ` Josue Emmanuel Amaro
2000-11-20 2:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-04 1:09 Julian Anastasov
2000-11-04 0:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-04 10:37 ` Julian Anastasov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A030EE2.92DC3F2@oracle.com \
--to=josue.amaro@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox