Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

David C. Davies
2001-01-07T02:12:17Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 522 bytes --]

All,

Please reply to daviesrallis@mediaone.net rather than this email account.

Regards,

Dave
------------------------------------

Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because
>> it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its
>> always MTU sized skbuffs.
>
>
> One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports
> that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card.
>
> Jeff
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 888 bytes --]