public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@timpanogas.org>
To: davej@suse.de, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Installing kernel 2.4
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 16:59:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A089766.43FD7CC0@timpanogas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011072322120.8187-100000@neo.local> <3A089254.397115FE@timpanogas.org> <3A08947C.1161F13C@timpanogas.org>



"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> 
> "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> >
> > davej@suse.de wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are tests for all this in the feature flags for intel and
> > > > non-intel CPUs like AMD -- including MTRR settings.  All of this could
> > > > be dynamic.  Here's some code that does this, and it's similiar to
> > > > NetWare.  It detexts CPU type, feature flags, special instructions,
> > > > etc.  All of this on x86 could be dynamically detected.
> > >
> > > Detecting the CPU isn't the issue (we already do all this), it's what to
> > > do when you've figured out what the CPU is. Show me code that can
> > > dynamically adjust the alignment of the routines/variables/structs
> > > dependant upon cacheline size.
> 
> ftp.timpanogas.org/manos/manos0817.tar.gz
> 
> Look in the PE loader -- Microsoft's PE loader can do this since
> everything is RVA based.  If you want to take the loader and put it in
> Linux, be my guest.  You can even combine mutiple i86 segments all
> compiled under different options (or architectures) and bundle them into
> a single executable file -- not somthing gcc can do today -- even with
> DLL.  This code is almost identical to the PE loader used in NT -- with
> one exception, I omit the fs:_THREAD_DLS startup code...
> 
> 8)
> 
> Jeff
> 
> >
> > If the compiler always aligned all functions and data on 16 byte
> > boundries (NetWare)
> > for all i386 code, it would run a lot faster.  Cache line alignment
> > could be an option in the loader .... after all, it's hte loader that
> > locates data in memory.  If Linux were PE based, relocation logic would
> > be a snap with this model (like NT).

Also, init.386 has an x86 real mode PE loader as well that could easily
be used to load Linux as a DLL instead of a coff binary.  Then you could
combine several executable segments of differing optimizations and
select the correct one at load time.  I do this now.  It's pretty easy
to do with PE ...

Jeff

> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Davej.
> > >
> > > --
> > > | Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>  http://www.suse.de/~davej
> > > | SuSE Labs
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-11-08  0:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-11-07 23:24 Installing kernel 2.4 davej
2000-11-07 23:37 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 23:47   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 23:59     ` Jeff V. Merkey [this message]
2000-11-08  0:51     ` David Lang
2000-11-08  0:10       ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08  3:39         ` davej
2000-11-08  4:41           ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08  3:57             ` davej
2000-11-08 12:05             ` Horst von Brand
2000-11-08 15:29               ` Eric W. Biederman
2000-11-08 16:51               ` James A. Sutherland
2000-11-08 17:36                 ` George Anzinger
2000-11-08 19:43                   ` James A. Sutherland
2000-11-08 20:32                     ` George Anzinger
2000-11-08 22:01                       ` James A. Sutherland
2000-11-09 13:25                       ` David Woodhouse
2000-11-09 18:24                         ` James A. Sutherland
2000-11-08  3:30     ` davej
2000-11-08  0:03   ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08  0:06     ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08  3:25   ` davej
2000-11-08  4:36     ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08  3:50       ` davej
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-08 19:19 David Feuer
2000-11-08 13:49 Bruce_Holzrichter
2000-11-08 15:10 ` davej
2000-11-08 19:16 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 13:43 Jesse Pollard
2000-11-08 18:52 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08  2:25 Marty Fouts
2000-11-08  3:43 ` davej
2000-11-08  2:19 Marty Fouts
2000-11-07 22:49 Bruce_Holzrichter
2000-11-07 20:52 Anil kumar
2000-11-07 20:59 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 21:39 ` Tigran Aivazian
2000-11-07 22:28   ` Martin Josefsson
2000-11-07 22:32     ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 22:51       ` kernel
2000-11-07 23:10         ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 23:57           ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08  0:01             ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08  0:10               ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08  0:12                 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-10  8:22                   ` Mark W. McClelland
2000-11-09 13:40                     ` Alan Cox
2000-11-08  2:18                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-08  7:35                   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08  0:54               ` Alan Cox
2000-11-08  3:31               ` Matthew Kirkwood
2000-11-08  0:11           ` David Lang
2000-11-07 23:39             ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 23:51             ` Sven Koch
2000-11-07 23:59               ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08  0:18               ` David Relson
2000-11-08  0:23                 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08  0:50                   ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08  0:52                     ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08  0:49           ` Alan Cox
2000-11-08  0:47             ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08  0:57               ` Alan Cox
2000-11-08  0:54                 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 22:52       ` J . A . Magallon
2000-11-07 22:54       ` J Sloan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A089766.43FD7CC0@timpanogas.org \
    --to=jmerkey@timpanogas.org \
    --cc=davej@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox