From: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: "James A. Sutherland" <jas88@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>,
"Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Installing kernel 2.4
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 09:36:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A098F11.1B89EB7B@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200011081205.eA8C5ui27838@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> <00110816543500.01639@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk>
But, here the customer did run the configure code (he said he did not
change anything). Isn't this where the machine should be diagnosed and
the right options chosen? Need a way to say it is a cross build, but
that shouldn't be too hard.
My $.02 worth.
George
"James A. Sutherland" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2000, Horst von Brand wrote:
> > "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org> said:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Your way out in the weeds. What started this thread was a customer who
> > > ended up loading the wrong arch on a system and hanging. I have to
> > > post a kernel RPM for our release, and it's onerous to make customers
> > > recompile kernels all the time and be guinea pigs for arch ports.
> >
> > I'd prefer to be a guinea pig for one of 3 or 4 generic kernels distributed
> > in binary than of one of the hundreds of possibilities of patching a kernel
> > together at boot, plus the (presumamby rather complex and fragile)
> > machinery to do so *before* the kernel is booted, thank you very much.
>
> Hmm... some mechanism for selecting the appropriate *module* might be nice,
> after boot...
>
> > Plus I'm getting pissed off by how long a boot takes as it stands today...
>
> Yep: slowing down boottimes is not an attractive idea.
>
> > > They just want it to boot, and run with the same level of ease of use
> > > and stability they get with NT and NetWare and other stuff they are used
> > > to. This is an easy choice from where I'm sitting.
> >
> > Easy: i386. Or i486 (I very much doubt your customers run on less, and this
> > should be geneic enough).
>
> I think there are better options. Jeff could, for example, *optimise* for
> Pentium II/III, without using PII specific instructions, in the main kernel,
> then have multiple target binaries for modules.
>
> James.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-08 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-07 23:24 Installing kernel 2.4 davej
2000-11-07 23:37 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 23:47 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 23:59 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 0:51 ` David Lang
2000-11-08 0:10 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 3:39 ` davej
2000-11-08 4:41 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 3:57 ` davej
2000-11-08 12:05 ` Horst von Brand
2000-11-08 15:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2000-11-08 16:51 ` James A. Sutherland
2000-11-08 17:36 ` George Anzinger [this message]
2000-11-08 19:43 ` James A. Sutherland
2000-11-08 20:32 ` George Anzinger
2000-11-08 22:01 ` James A. Sutherland
2000-11-09 13:25 ` David Woodhouse
2000-11-09 18:24 ` James A. Sutherland
2000-11-08 3:30 ` davej
2000-11-08 0:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08 0:06 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 3:25 ` davej
2000-11-08 4:36 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 3:50 ` davej
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-08 19:19 David Feuer
2000-11-08 13:49 Bruce_Holzrichter
2000-11-08 15:10 ` davej
2000-11-08 19:16 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 13:43 Jesse Pollard
2000-11-08 18:52 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 2:25 Marty Fouts
2000-11-08 3:43 ` davej
2000-11-08 2:19 Marty Fouts
2000-11-07 22:49 Bruce_Holzrichter
2000-11-07 20:52 Anil kumar
2000-11-07 20:59 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 21:39 ` Tigran Aivazian
2000-11-07 22:28 ` Martin Josefsson
2000-11-07 22:32 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 22:51 ` kernel
2000-11-07 23:10 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 23:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08 0:01 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 0:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08 0:12 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-10 8:22 ` Mark W. McClelland
2000-11-09 13:40 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-08 2:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-08 7:35 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 0:54 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-08 3:31 ` Matthew Kirkwood
2000-11-08 0:11 ` David Lang
2000-11-07 23:39 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 23:51 ` Sven Koch
2000-11-07 23:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08 0:18 ` David Relson
2000-11-08 0:23 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 0:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08 0:52 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 0:49 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-08 0:47 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-08 0:57 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-08 0:54 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-07 22:52 ` J . A . Magallon
2000-11-07 22:54 ` J Sloan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A098F11.1B89EB7B@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=jas88@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox