From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ?
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:44:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A16CE07.37A9F4B6@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200011181750.SAA14559@cave.bitwizard.nl>
Rogier Wolff wrote:
>
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Rogier Wolff wrote:
> > >
> > > Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > What is the difference between a module that exports no symbols and
> > > > > includes EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS reference, and such a module that lacks
> > > > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS?
> > > > >
> > > > > Alan once upbraided me for assuming they were the same :)
> > > >
> > > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS - nothing exported
> > > > MODULE_foo - export specific symbol
> > > >
> > > > none of the above, export all globals but without modvers
> > > ^^^^^^^ and statics!!!!
> > >
> > > I consider that a bug, but...
> >
> > eh? Can you give an example of this? This should definitely -not- be
> > the case.
>
> Compile a kernel, marking "sx" and "riscom8" as modules.
>
> Install, modprobe sx, and voila, you'll pull in the riscom because
> its "block_til_ready" static was found to satisfy the block_til_ready
> from generic_serial.
That doesn't imply that statics are being exported as symbols.
generic_serial had no EXPORT_xxx markers, and block_til_ready was
public, so it was expected behavior for g_s to export b_t_r as a symbol.
It is strange that a static which exists in riscom8 causes another
module which exports the same symbol to be pulled in.
> We're working on renaming the one in generic_serial to
> "gs_block_til_ready", but haven't checked yet if the patch got
> applied. So you may have to use a "month-old" kernel for this test.
Can this function be made static? It looks like many drivers define it
themselves..
In any case, you have a patch coming to you [offline] cleaning up the sx
and riscom8 namespaces...
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense
MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-18 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-18 5:15 EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? Jeff Garzik
2000-11-18 7:40 ` Keith Owens
2000-11-18 17:12 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-18 17:40 ` Rogier Wolff
2000-11-18 17:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-18 17:50 ` Rogier Wolff
2000-11-18 18:44 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2000-11-19 8:12 ` Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A16CE07.37A9F4B6@mandrakesoft.com \
--to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox