From: John Cavan <johncavan@home.com>
To: Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (new for ppa and imm) Re: [PATCH] Re: Patch to fix lockup on ppa insert
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:10:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A16FE50.2B6BA09B@home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A13D4BA.AD4A580B@home.com> <3A13D8D6.8C12E31A@home.com> <20001116162027.C597@suse.de> <3A149D00.9D38FA24@home.com> <20001117102411.S6735@redhat.com>
Tim Waugh wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:50:40PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
>
> > [...] This patch unlocks, allows the lowlevel driver to do it's
> > probes, and then relocks. It could probably be more granular in the
> > parport_pc code, but my own home tests show it to be working fine.
>
> Is that safe?
I'm not sure. I know why it causes the NMI lockup, but I'm not enough of
an expert to sort it out. I've got a pretty good feel for the Zip
driver, but not the parport or scsi code yet, so I don't know how safe
it is. The new scsi error stuff does mention that drivers must
spinunlock/spinlock if it enables interrupts.
> Also, what bit of the parport code is tripping over the lock?
> Request_module or something?
During the init phase of the parport_pc module it probes and enables the
IRQ(s) of the parallel port, but the scsi layer has them locked.
> A nicer fix would probably be to use parport_register_driver, but
> that's likely to be too big a change right now.
I agree and it's recommended in the parport code. Now if I can get
enough time, I will take a stab at it, but nobody should be relying on
me for it. :o)
John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-18 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-16 12:36 Patch to fix lockup on ppa insert John Cavan
2000-11-16 12:53 ` [PATCH] " John Cavan
2000-11-16 15:20 ` Jens Axboe
2000-11-17 2:50 ` [PATCH] (new for ppa and imm) " John Cavan
2000-11-17 10:24 ` Tim Waugh
2000-11-18 22:10 ` John Cavan [this message]
2000-11-20 12:51 ` Tim Waugh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A16FE50.2B6BA09B@home.com \
--to=johncavan@home.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=twaugh@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox