modutils 2.3.20 not backward compatible

modutils 2.3.20 not backward compatible

[Jeff V. Merkey]

Keith,

Was there a reason we removed the -i and -m options from newer modutils
and broke backwards caompatibility?  I'm re-writing our module build
scripts for the installer, and I discovered after upgrading to 2.3.20,
that all the build scripts (about 10MB worth) are now busted and I have
been spending most of this evening rewriting them so they work again.   

Thanks

Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: modutils 2.3.20 not backward compatible

[Keith Owens]

On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:17:47 -0700, 
"Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@timpanogas.org> wrote:
>Was there a reason we removed the -i and -m options from newer modutils
>and broke backwards caompatibility?  I'm re-writing our module build
>scripts for the installer, and I discovered after upgrading to 2.3.20,
>that all the build scripts (about 10MB worth) are now busted and I have
>been spending most of this evening rewriting them so they work again.   

-i and -m have never been in the base code.  -i in depmod is a Redhat
add on, only in their distribution.  I have no idea what -m does, apart
from -m in insmod which is supported.  Blame the distributors.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: modutils 2.3.20 not backward compatible

[Jeff V. Merkey]

Keith Owens wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:17:47 -0700,
> "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@timpanogas.org> wrote:
> >Was there a reason we removed the -i and -m options from newer modutils
> >and broke backwards caompatibility?  I'm re-writing our module build
> >scripts for the installer, and I discovered after upgrading to 2.3.20,
> >that all the build scripts (about 10MB worth) are now busted and I have
> >been spending most of this evening rewriting them so they work again.
> 
> -i and -m have never been in the base code.  -i in depmod is a Redhat
> add on, only in their distribution.  I have no idea what -m does, apart
> from -m in insmod which is supported.  Blame the distributors.

Thanks for clarifying.  -i ignores certain dependency failures, and is
very dangerous.  -m lets you use a map file.  If what you say is
correct, then it was an erstwhile exercise rewriting these scripts,
since they will now take generic parameters.  

Jeff

> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: modutils 2.3.20 not backward compatible

[Igmar Palsenberg]

> -i and -m have never been in the base code.  -i in depmod is a Redhat
> add on, only in their distribution.  I have no idea what -m does, apart
> from -m in insmod which is supported.  Blame the distributors.

-m == -F in depmod (RH anyways)


	Igmar

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/