From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frank Ronny Larsen <frankrl@nhn.no>,
Frank Ronny Larsen <gobo@gimle.nu>,
Jannik Rasmussen <jannik@east.no>,
"Lars Christian Nygård" <lars@snart.com>
Subject: Re: ext2 compression: How about using the Netware principle?
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 13:51:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A1D12B5.D0AF250C@karlsbakk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A193A12.9B384B61@karlsbakk.net> <20001122132922.A41@toy>
> > - A file is saved to disk
> > - If the file isn't touched (read or written to) within <n> days
> > (default 14), the file is compressed.
> > - If the file isn't compressed more than <n> percent (default 20), the
> > file is flagged "can't compress".
> > - All file compression is done on low traffic times (default between
> > 00:00 and 06:00 hours)
> > - The first time a file is read or written to within the <n> days
> > interval mentioned above, the file is addressed using realtime
> > compression. The second time, the file is decompressed and commited to
> > disk (uncompressed).
>
> Oops, that means that merely reading a file followed by powerfail can
> lead to you loosing the file. Oops.
eh.. don't think so.
READ
DECOMPRESS
WRITE
SYNC
DELETE OLD COMPRESSED FILE
or something
> Besides: you can do this in userspace with existing e2compr. Should take
> less than 2 days to implement.
ok
never seen that...
> > Results:
> > A minimum of CPU time is wasted compressing/decompressing files.
> > The average server I've been out working with have an effective
> > compression of somewhere between 30 and 100 per cent.
>
> Results: NOP at machines that are never on in that time, random corruption
> after powerfail between 0:00-6:00, .. Pavel
I'm talking about file servers. Not merely a bloody PC. On a PC, hard disk
space doesn't really cost anything and you can manually compress what you're
not using.
roy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-23 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-20 14:49 ext2 compression: How about using the Netware principle? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2000-11-21 20:00 ` Jorge Nerin
2000-11-22 13:29 ` Pavel Machek
2000-11-23 11:07 ` Anders K. Pedersen
2000-11-23 12:51 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [this message]
2000-11-24 10:15 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A1D12B5.D0AF250C@karlsbakk.net \
--to=roy@karlsbakk.net \
--cc=frankrl@nhn.no \
--cc=gobo@gimle.nu \
--cc=jannik@east.no \
--cc=lars@snart.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox