From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Tobias Ringstrom <tori@tellus.mine.nu>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
andrewm@uow.edu.au, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 3c59x: Using bad IRQ 0
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 19:14:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A1DB2DC.366D1F8@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011231027440.928-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> > >
> > > - enable DEBUG in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h. This should make the code
> > > print out what the pirq table entries are etc.
> >
> > Done. When adding the call to eisa_set_level_irq, the line
> >
> > IRQ for 00:0a.0(0) via 00:0a.0 -> PIRQ 03, mask 1eb8, excl 0000 -> newirq=9 -> assigning IRQ 9 ... OK
> >
> > was changed into
> >
> > IRQ for 00:0a.0(0) via 00:0a.0 -> PIRQ 03, mask 1eb8, excl 0000 -> newirq=9 -> assigning IRQ 9 -> edge ... OK
>
> Ok.
>
> The thing was marked as edge-triggered, which is basically always wrong
> for a PCI interrupt. The above printout just means that it now noticed
> that it was edge, and fixed it up in the ELCR.
FWIW Via's PCI to ISA bridge has a PIRQ edge/level register.
Vendor=1106h, Device=686h, PCI config offset 54h, RW
Bits 7-4 reserved, zero.
Bit 3: PIRQA# edge (clear bit for level)
Bit 2: PIRQB# edge (clear bit for level)
Bit 1: PIRQC# edge (clear bit for level)
Bit 0: PIRQD# edge (clear bit for level)
The bits are all supposed to default to zero (level).
> > > - add the line "eisa_set_level_irq(irq);" to pirq_via_set() just before
> > > the "return 1;"
> >
> > You certainly know your kernel very well... :-)
>
> That's why they pay me the big bucks. Good.
>
> I'll make it do the eisa_set_level_irq() in the generic code: it should
> always be right (we don't do it now in the PIIX4 case, for example, but
> the PIIX documentation actually says that we _should_), and there is no
> need to do it separately for each interrupt router.
So calling eisa_set_level_irq() means nothing will scream if we do not
update [for example] the above register?
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense
MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-24 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-21 19:09 3c59x: Using bad IRQ 0 Tobias Ringstrom
2000-11-21 19:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-21 22:18 ` Tobias Ringstrom
2000-11-23 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-11-23 18:21 ` Tobias Ringstrom
2000-11-23 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-11-24 0:14 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2000-11-22 1:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-11-24 14:59 ` Erik Mouw
2000-11-24 23:14 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A1DB2DC.366D1F8@mandrakesoft.com \
--to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tori@tellus.mine.nu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox