From: Gerard Sharp <gsharp@ihug.co.nz>
To: "kernel@netravi.net" <kernel@netravi.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HPT366 + SMP = slight corruption in 2.3.99 - 2.4.0-11
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 22:23:18 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A2F5706.5CCF5771@ihug.co.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012060315450.31693-100000@localhost.localdomain>
"kernel@netravi.net" wrote:
> On 2.2.17 I had good luck with BP6.
Never tried the 2.2 series with this controller - probably should get
around to doing that this weekend. :S
> EX:
> [root@animal /root]# uptime
> 3:17am up 51 days, 20:17, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.02
Uptime proves nothing alas; I could get 30+ days if I wanted :S
> Can you post/e-mail any additional details about the lockups. I am very
> curious about this. We have a huge mosix cluster in production with BP6
> mobo's and have plans to upgrade to 2.4 as soon as an official stable
> kernel is released.
The problem is not one of lockups. The system in question doesn't lock;
it doesn't crash; it doesn't even log anything at the time - not even
APIC errors.
Instead it quietly and silently corrupts exactly four bytes at a time;
mostly on the last four bytes of a 4096 block...
I can most easily cause the corruption by copying a large amount of
known data across the disk, and then checking for differences:
cp -aR /usr/src/linux /usr/src/l2 ; diff -dur /usr/src/linux /usr/src/l2
When it does corrupt in this manner, it is not so much of a concern - I
can detect, delete, and recopy the corrupted file(s).
What is more worrying is, what if it is quietly silently and happily
corrupting other data - when I'm NOT staring at it with a paranoid
concern; for example, compiling binaries; or altering large data
files...
As such, I cannot at this time reduce the problem to one of Software or
Hardware Error; and while it is A Major Problem in my eyes; I avoid it
currently by not using the hpt366 controller :)
Gerard Sharp
Two Penguins at 1024x768
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-07 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-01 11:04 HPT366 + SMP = slight corruption in 2.3.99 - 2.4.0-11 Gerard Sharp
2000-12-02 16:25 ` Gnea
2000-12-04 16:10 ` Gerard Sharp
2000-12-04 20:49 ` Dan Hollis
2000-12-04 21:27 ` Richard Torkar
2000-12-04 21:41 ` Dan Hollis
2000-12-04 21:51 ` Mike Dresser
2000-12-06 10:33 ` Gerard Sharp
2000-12-06 11:23 ` kernel
2000-12-07 9:23 ` Gerard Sharp [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-04 16:39 Gerard Sharp
2000-12-05 20:34 Winfried Truemper
2000-12-09 9:43 Gerard Sharp
2000-12-09 9:57 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-12-10 3:26 ` Gerard Sharp
2000-12-10 12:15 ` Hakan Lennestal
2000-12-10 16:25 ` David Woodhouse
2000-12-10 17:17 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-12-10 19:01 ` Hakan Lennestal
2000-12-10 21:07 ` Gerard Sharp
2000-12-11 8:03 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-12-10 3:30 ` Gerard Sharp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A2F5706.5CCF5771@ihug.co.nz \
--to=gsharp@ihug.co.nz \
--cc=kernel@netravi.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox