From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 22:19:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 22:19:40 -0500 Received: from gear.torque.net ([204.138.244.1]:29710 "EHLO gear.torque.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 22:19:30 -0500 Message-ID: <3A416F1B.8E2FB200@torque.net> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 21:46:51 -0500 From: Douglas Gilbert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test13-pre3 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Ian Stirling Subject: Re: Laptop system clock slow after suspend to disk. (2.4.0-test9/hinote VP) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ian Stirling wrote: > I've not noticed this on earlier kernel versions, is there something > silly I'm missing that's making my DEC hinote VP (p100 laptop)s > system clock slow by a factor of five or so after resume? > Not the CPU or cmos clock, only the system clock. > Thoughts welcome. I saw something like this on my thinkpad (RH6.2) and it turned out to be connected to /etc/adjtime . It was cured by changing the large numbers in there to zeroes. Could someone explain the mechanism? Doug Gilbert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/