* Re: Laptop system clock slow after suspend to disk. (2.4.0-test9/hinote VP)
@ 2000-12-21 2:46 Douglas Gilbert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Gilbert @ 2000-12-21 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Ian Stirling
Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> I've not noticed this on earlier kernel versions, is there something
> silly I'm missing that's making my DEC hinote VP (p100 laptop)s
> system clock slow by a factor of five or so after resume?
> Not the CPU or cmos clock, only the system clock.
> Thoughts welcome.
I saw something like this on my thinkpad (RH6.2)
and it turned out to be connected to /etc/adjtime .
It was cured by changing the large numbers in
there to zeroes.
Could someone explain the mechanism?
Doug Gilbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: iptables: "stateful inspection?"
@ 2000-12-21 0:44 Alan Cox
2000-12-21 2:26 ` Laptop system clock slow after suspend to disk. (2.4.0-test9/hinote VP) Ian Stirling
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2000-12-21 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Rothwell; +Cc: Alan Cox, Michael H. Warfield, linux-kernel
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > It does SYN checking. If you are running 'serious' security you wouldnt be
> > allowing outgoing connections anyway. One windows christmascard.exe virus that
> > connects back to an irc server to take input and you are hosed.
>
> Thankfully, pine and mutt are, to date, immune to that kind of thing. :)
There have been at least five holes found in pile that _could_ have been
exploited, and even one in all xterms pre X11R6 where ascii+escape codes
was all you needed.
Mutt has had minor things fixed for security reasons too.
It's harder. But you ignore two things - once someone does it anyone can
repeat it - and more importantly almost all exploits rely on user error.
Linux users are not always brighter than windows ones and there isnt a lot
you can do to make them smarter
Think of computer security like powertools. The day you think you are totally
safe is the day you end up hurt.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Laptop system clock slow after suspend to disk. (2.4.0-test9/hinote VP)
2000-12-21 0:44 iptables: "stateful inspection?" Alan Cox
@ 2000-12-21 2:26 ` Ian Stirling
2000-12-21 22:05 ` Keith Owens
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Stirling @ 2000-12-21 2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I've not noticed this on earlier kernel versions, is there something
silly I'm missing that's making my DEC hinote VP (p100 laptop)s
system clock slow by a factor of five or so after resume?
Not the CPU or cmos clock, only the system clock.
Thoughts welcome.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Laptop system clock slow after suspend to disk. (2.4.0-test9/hinote VP)
2000-12-21 2:26 ` Laptop system clock slow after suspend to disk. (2.4.0-test9/hinote VP) Ian Stirling
@ 2000-12-21 22:05 ` Keith Owens
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keith Owens @ 2000-12-21 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Stirling; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 02:26:12 +0000 (GMT),
Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>I've not noticed this on earlier kernel versions, is there something
>silly I'm missing that's making my DEC hinote VP (p100 laptop)s
>system clock slow by a factor of five or so after resume?
>Not the CPU or cmos clock, only the system clock.
Try this.
Index: 0-test13-pre3.2/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
--- 0-test13-pre3.2/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:23:40 +1100 kaos (linux-2.4/z/c/34_apm.c 1.1.1.7.2.5 644)
+++ 0-test13-pre3.2(w)/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:04:28 +1100 kaos (linux-2.4/z/c/34_apm.c 1.1.1.7.2.5 644)
@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ extern int (*console_blank_hook)(int);
* David Chen <chen@ctpa04.mit.edu>
*/
#undef INIT_TIMER_AFTER_SUSPEND
+#define INIT_TIMER_AFTER_SUSPEND
#ifdef INIT_TIMER_AFTER_SUSPEND
#include <linux/timex.h>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-21 22:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-21 2:46 Laptop system clock slow after suspend to disk. (2.4.0-test9/hinote VP) Douglas Gilbert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-21 0:44 iptables: "stateful inspection?" Alan Cox
2000-12-21 2:26 ` Laptop system clock slow after suspend to disk. (2.4.0-test9/hinote VP) Ian Stirling
2000-12-21 22:05 ` Keith Owens
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox