From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 02:10:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 02:10:07 -0500 Received: from webmail.metabyte.com ([216.218.208.53]:4196 "EHLO webmail.metabyte.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 02:09:54 -0500 Message-ID: <3A542148.AAE1D8E9@metabyte.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 23:07:52 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2? In-Reply-To: <3A541361.65942CB3@metabyte.com> <200101040611.WAA01811@pizda.ninka.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2001 07:09:52.0891 (UTC) FILETIME=[559DD4B0:01C0761D] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 22:08:33 -0800 > From: Pete Zaitcev > > Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on > plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or > is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan? > > I do not understand, I just got a working 2.2.19-pre6 build on one of > my 6.2 Sparc64 systems, what kind of failure do you see? Oops. I cannot reproduce it anymore. Since I am quite sure in my recollection of this problem, I conclude that there was a kernel (perhaps 2.2.19-pre3), that called kwhich with several arguments. No problem now on the pre6. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/