From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 03:18:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 03:18:42 -0500 Received: from vasquez.zip.com.au ([203.12.97.41]:41231 "EHLO vasquez.zip.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 03:18:26 -0500 Message-ID: <3A54332E.58374060@uow.edu.au> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 19:24:14 +1100 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test8 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Pete Zaitcev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2? In-Reply-To: <3A541361.65942CB3@metabyte.com> <3A5430C6.FBAB094A@uow.edu.au>, <3A5430C6.FBAB094A@uow.edu.au>; from andrewm@uow.edu.au on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100 <20010104091241.B18973@gruyere.muc.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Silly question: > > > > can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done > > with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink.... > > And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? I don't buy that. The compulsory modutils upgrade a couple of months back caused, what? Ten emails? > Would you volunteer to handle the support load on l-k that would cause? With pleasure. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/