From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 05:54:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 05:54:20 -0500 Received: from mta13-acc.tin.it ([212.216.176.44]:11999 "EHLO fep13-svc.tin.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 05:54:03 -0500 Message-ID: <3A546385.C50B1092@tin.it> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 11:50:29 +0000 From: "A.D.F." Reply-To: adefacc@tin.it Organization: Private X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I would like to know whether following limits are right for kernel 2.4.x: Max. N. of CPU: 32 (SMP) Max. CPU speed: > 2 Ghz (up to ?) Max. RAM size: 64 GB (any slowness accessing RAM over 4 GB with 32 bit machines ?) Max. file size: 1 TB (?) Max. file system size: 2 TB (?) Max. N. of files per FS: 2^32 (depending on max. n. of inodes ?) Max. N. of users/groups: 2^32 (well, that's in theory, probably practical limits, due to RAM usage, access time, etc., are much lower). Other upper limits, eventually compared with those of latest 2.2.x kernels, would be appreciated. Thanks in advance for your patience. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/