* ipchains vs netfilter performance
@ 2001-01-07 20:14 ed
2001-01-08 11:37 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: ed @ 2001-01-07 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I've noticed that my Linux boxes take quite a hit in terms of
packets per second rate when I define ipchains rules with
2.2.X kernels. Does the netfilter replacement found in 2.4
kernels improve this performance?
11101101 (Ed)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: ipchains vs netfilter performance
2001-01-07 20:14 ipchains vs netfilter performance ed
@ 2001-01-08 11:37 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2001-01-08 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ed; +Cc: linux-kernel
In message <3A585D9F.21907.1452FA04@localhost> you write:
> I've noticed that my Linux boxes take quite a hit in terms of
> packets per second rate when I define ipchains rules with
> 2.2.X kernels. Does the netfilter replacement found in 2.4
> kernels improve this performance?
Not really. What are your rules?
Rusty.
--
http://linux.conf.au The Linux conference Australia needed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-01-08 23:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-01-07 20:14 ipchains vs netfilter performance ed
2001-01-08 11:37 ` Rusty Russell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox