From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:09:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:09:40 -0500 Received: from igor.alcpress.com ([206.190.136.130]:10002 "HELO igor.alcpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:09:31 -0500 From: ed@alcpress.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 12:14:23 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: ipchains vs netfilter performance Reply-To: ed@alcpress.com Message-ID: <3A585D9F.21907.1452FA04@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've noticed that my Linux boxes take quite a hit in terms of packets per second rate when I define ipchains rules with 2.2.X kernels. Does the netfilter replacement found in 2.4 kernels improve this performance? 11101101 (Ed) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/