public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Sandy Harris <sandy@storm.ca>
Cc: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@oss.sgi.com" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: routable interfaces  WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT   meet Linus' sumission policy!)
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 13:42:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A58D49D.C4152BD5@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0101071321330.18916-100000@shell.cyberus.ca> <3A58C137.63907CDC@storm.ca>

Sandy Harris wrote:
> 
> jamal wrote:
> 
> > > What problem does this fix?
> > >
> > > If you are mucking with the ifindex, you may be affecting many places
> > > in the rest of the kernel, as well as user-space programs which use
> > > ifindex to bind to raw devices.
> >
> > I am talking about 2.5 possibilities now that 2.4 is out. I think
> > "parasitic/virtual" interfaces is not a issue specific to VLANs.
> > VLANs happen to use devices today to solve the problem.
> > As pointed by that example no routing daemons are doing aliased
> > interfaces (which are also virtual interfaces).
> > We need some more general solution.
> >
> Something like this also becomes an issue when you want routing
> daemons to interact sensibly with IPSEC tunnels. A paper on these
> issues is at:
> 
> http://www.quintillion.com/fdis/moat/ipsec+routing/
> 
> It is not (AFAIK) clear that the FreeS/WAN team will adopt the solutions
> suggested there, but it is very clear we need to deal with those issues.

Hrm, what if they just made each IP-SEC interface a net_device?  If they
are a routable entity, with it's own IP address, it starts to look a lot
like an interface/net_device.

This has seeming worked well for VLANs:  Maybe net_device is already
general enough??

So, what would be the down-side of having VLANs and other virtual interfaces
be net_devices?  The only thing I ever thought of was the linear lookups,
which is why I wrote the hash code.  The beauty of working with existing
user-space tools should not be over-looked!

It may be easier to fix other problems with many interface/net_devices
than cram a whole other virtual net_device structure (with many duplicate
functionalities found in the current net_device).

Ben

-- 
Ben Greear (greearb@candelatech.com)  http://www.candelatech.com
Author of ScryMUD:  scry.wanfear.com 4444        (Released under GPL)
http://scry.wanfear.com               http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-07 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-06 21:33 [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Ben Greear
2001-01-06 23:17 ` David S. Miller
2001-01-07  4:06   ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07  5:36     ` David S. Miller
2001-01-07 13:42     ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission Alan Cox
2001-01-07 15:33       ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 16:46         ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 17:32           ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 19:02       ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:06         ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 18:53           ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 19:30           ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:30             ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 22:40           ` 5116
2001-01-08  2:19           ` David Ford
2001-01-09 20:25           ` Christopher E. Brown
2001-01-10  2:47             ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:21         ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:00           ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 19:10             ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:24               ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-08  0:21                 ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:37           ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:53             ` jamal
2001-01-07  3:29 ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-07  5:40   ` David S. Miller
2001-01-07  6:15   ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 10:22   ` David Ford
2001-01-07 12:13     ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-07 12:01       ` David S. Miller
2001-01-08  5:32         ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-08  6:12           ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-08  6:26             ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-08  6:57               ` David Ford
2001-01-08 13:08                 ` jamal
2001-01-09 13:28                   ` Blu3Viper
2001-01-08  6:13           ` Blu3Viper
2001-01-07 12:19       ` David Ford
2001-01-07 16:56   ` jamal
2001-01-07 17:37     ` Gleb Natapov
2001-01-07 18:02       ` routable interfaces WAS( " jamal
2001-01-07 19:21         ` routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (DoesNOT " Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:29           ` jamal
2001-01-07 18:51             ` Gleb Natapov
2001-01-07 19:05               ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:19             ` routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT " Sandy Harris
2001-01-07 20:42               ` Ben Greear [this message]
2001-01-08  0:37                 ` jamal
2001-01-08  5:25                   ` routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOTmeet " Ben Greear
2001-01-08 13:05                     ` jamal
2001-01-07  3:29 ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet " Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  4:00   ` jamal
2001-01-07  4:06     ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  5:43     ` David S. Miller
2001-01-07 11:40       ` [little bit OT] ip _IS_ _NOT_ ifconfig and route ! (was Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)) Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-01-07 11:50         ` David S. Miller
2001-01-07 13:47       ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission Alan Cox
2001-01-07 16:12         ` jamal
2001-01-07 16:51           ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 15:56       ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) jamal
2001-01-07 16:30         ` Gleb Natapov
2001-01-07 16:36           ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:54         ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumissionpolicy!) Ben Greear
2001-01-07  6:24     ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07  5:29       ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  6:22   ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Ben Greear
2001-01-07  5:27     ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  8:11       ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) (Benchmarks) Ben Greear
2001-01-07  7:15         ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-08  8:12         ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks) Ben Greear
2001-01-08  7:00           ` David S. Miller
2001-01-08 16:26             ` Ben Greear
2001-01-08 16:50               ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-09 16:27                 ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 13:50     ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission Alan Cox
2001-01-07 16:44       ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2001-01-07 19:09       ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A58D49D.C4152BD5@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=sandy@storm.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox