From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
To: mo6 <sjoos@pandora.be>
Cc: Robert Kaiser <rob@sysgo.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ?
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:18:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A5CC3A1.3D8F6BF3@didntduck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01010922090000.02630@rob> <3A5B7F76.ABDFED7A@didntduck.org> <01010922264400.02737@rob> <20010110205127.B982@pandora.be>
mo6 wrote:
> I dug up an old amd 386 and started compiling kernels for it with gcc 2.95.2:
>
> 2.4.0 : doesn't boot, same symptoms as you, Robert, so you're not imagining
> things :-)
> 2.2.19pre6 : compiles, boots and runs poifectly
> 2.3.51 : doesn't compile
> 2.3.99-pre1 : hrm, *cough*
> 2.3.99-pre2 : *tsjoum*
> 2.3.39: compiles and boots okay
>
> here is where I got bored :-)
>
> okay, anyone, which 2.3.x kernels should compile okay ?
move up to 2.4.0-testX kernels
--
Brian Gerst
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-10 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-09 20:53 Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 21:15 ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 21:17 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 21:46 ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 22:17 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 22:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-09 23:44 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 0:19 ` Alex Buell
2001-01-10 0:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-10 0:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-10 16:00 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 21:29 ` Tom G. Christensen
2001-01-10 22:04 ` X performance on 2.4.0 v.s. 2.4.0-test12 Alan Olsen
2001-01-09 23:03 ` Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 23:04 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 23:28 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-01-09 23:42 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 1:48 ` Miles Lane
2001-01-10 15:25 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 21:04 ` Miles Lane
2001-01-10 16:28 ` Paul Gortmaker
2001-01-15 18:38 ` [SOLVED + PATCH] " Robert Kaiser
2001-01-15 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-09 22:44 ` Timur Tabi
2001-01-09 21:59 ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-10 19:51 ` mo6
2001-01-10 20:18 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2001-01-10 21:53 ` mo6
2001-01-11 12:20 ` mo6
2001-01-10 3:53 ` Tom Leete
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-10 9:25 richardj_moore
2001-01-10 14:19 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-10 15:04 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 15:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-10 16:02 ` Robert Kaiser
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.04.10101101000130.27018-100000@hantana.pdn.ac.lk>
2001-01-10 15:37 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 17:16 Petr Vandrovec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A5CC3A1.3D8F6BF3@didntduck.org \
--to=bgerst@didntduck.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@sysgo.de \
--cc=sjoos@pandora.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox