From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:34:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:34:03 -0500 Received: from ns1.megapath.net ([216.200.176.4]:31748 "EHLO megapathdsl.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:33:50 -0500 Message-ID: <3A5D6196.9020806@megapathdsl.net> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:32:38 -0800 From: Miles Lane User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-ac1 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010107 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miles Lane CC: Aaron Eppert , dhinds@zen.stanford.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.0 Patch for 3c575 In-Reply-To: <20010110204420.A7699@rose-hulman.edu> <3A5D20D6.6090906@megapathdsl.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Miles Lane wrote: > Huh. Well, I have a 3CCFE575BT "3c575" card and I have > had success using the 3c59x driver to enable the card. I just realised that I was not explicit before: I do not think this port of 3c575_cb should go into the kernel, since the device is already supported by 3c59x, unless there is some substantial benefit from using the 3c575_cb driver instead. Is there substantial benefit? Miles - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/