From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:46:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:46:07 -0500 Received: from cc361913-a.flrtn1.occa.home.com ([24.0.193.171]:33669 "EHLO mirai.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:45:59 -0500 Message-ID: <3A622C25.766F3BCE@pobox.com> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:45:57 -0800 From: J Sloan Organization: Mirai Consulting X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-ac9 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > Of course, you may be right on wuftpd. It obviously wasn't designed with > security in mind, other alternatives may be better. I run proftpd on all my ftp servers - it's fast, configurable and can do all the tricks I need - even red hat seems to agree that proftpd is the way to go. Visit any red hat ftp site and they are running proftpd - So, why do they keep shipping us wu-ftpd instead? That really frosts me. jjs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/