From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:02:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:02:14 -0500 Received: from cx97923-a.phnx3.az.home.com ([24.9.112.194]:40197 "EHLO grok.yi.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:02:05 -0500 Message-ID: <3A623EE8.644A572D@candelatech.com> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:06:00 -0700 From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "netdev@oss.sgi.com" , linux-kernel Subject: Question on 2.2.18 and setting a device to PROMISC. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This code works in 2.4.0: (The important part is the dev_set_promiscuity() method.) int vlan_dev_set_mac_address(struct net_device *dev, void* addr_struct_p) { int i; struct sockaddr *addr = (struct sockaddr*)(addr_struct_p); if (netif_running(dev)) { return -EBUSY; } memcpy(dev->dev_addr, addr->sa_data, dev->addr_len); printk("%s: Setting MAC address to ", dev->name); for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) { printk(" %2.2x", dev->dev_addr[i]); } printk(".\n"); if (memcmp(dev->vlan_dev->real_dev->dev_addr, dev->dev_addr, dev->addr_len) != 0) { if (dev->vlan_dev->real_dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC) { /* Already promiscious...leave it alone. */ printk("VLAN (%s): Good, underlying device (%s) is already promiscious.\n", dev->name, dev->vlan_dev->real_dev->name); } else { printk("VLAN (%s): Setting underlying device (%s) to promiscious mode.\n", dev->name, dev->vlan_dev->real_dev->name); dev_set_promiscuity(dev->vlan_dev->real_dev, 1); } } else { printk("VLAN (%s): Underlying device (%s) has same MAC, not checking promiscious mode.\n", dev->name, dev->vlan_dev->real_dev->name); } return 0; } But this code in the 2.2.18 kernel does not work. Specifically, the dev_set_promiscuity method fails to actually make the interface promiscious. Anyone know why? int vlan_dev_set_mac_address(struct device *dev, void* addr_struct_p) { int i; struct sockaddr *addr = (struct sockaddr*)(addr_struct_p); if (dev->start) { return -EBUSY; } memcpy(dev->dev_addr, addr->sa_data, dev->addr_len); printk("%s: Setting MAC address to ", dev->name); for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) { printk(" %2.2x", dev->dev_addr[i]); } printk(".\n"); if (memcmp(dev->vlan_dev->real_dev->dev_addr, dev->dev_addr, dev->addr_len) != 0) { if (dev->vlan_dev->real_dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC) { /* Already promiscious...leave it alone. */ printk("VLAN (%s): Good, underlying device (%s) is already promiscious.\n", dev->name, dev->vlan_dev->real_dev->name); } else { printk("VLAN (%s): Setting underlying device (%s) to promiscious mode.\n", dev->name, dev->vlan_dev->real_dev->name); dev_set_promiscuity(dev->vlan_dev->real_dev, 1); } } else { printk("VLAN (%s): Underlying device (%s) has same MAC, not checking promiscious mode.\n", dev->name, dev->vlan_dev->real_dev->name); } return 0; } -- Ben Greear (greearb@candelatech.com) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com 4444 (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/