From: David Balazic <david.balazic@uni-mb.si>
To: "Dr. Kelsey Hudson" <kernel@blackhole.compendium-tech.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:04:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A657C49.8D556099@uni-mb.si> (raw)
Dr. Kelsey Hudson (kernel@blackhole.compendium-tech.com) wrote :
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Venkatesh Ramamurthy wrote:
>
> > [Venkatesh Ramamurthy] Dont you think that mounting and booting
> > based on disk label names is better, then relying on device nodes which can
> > change when a new card is added?. The existing patch for 2.2.xx is quite
> > small and it does not bloat the kernel too much either. I think we can port
> > it for 2.4.XX with ease.In my words it is worth the effort
>
> Of course that would be better. The only complaint I have with such a
> system is that of backwards compatibility...as long as the legacy device
> names are still supported i would have no problem with it at all.
Yes, legacy names are supported. It is 100% backward compatible.
As far as I know ( I'm the author of the patch )
>
> however, this brings up an interesting question: what happens if two disks
> (presumably from two different machines) have the same disk label?
The first one found will be used. You are dependent on the ordering,
only in this special case, while before you were depending on ordering
every time.
> what
> happens then? for instance, i have several linux machines both at my
> workplace and my home. if for some reason one of these machines dies due
> to hardware failure and i want to get stuff off the drives, i put the disk
> containing the /home partition on the failed machine into a working
> machine and reboot. What /home gets mounted then? the original /home or
> the new one from the dead machine? (and don't say end users wouldn't
> possibly do that... if they are adding hardware into their systems this is
> by no means beyond their capabilities)
> at least with physical device nodes i can say 'computer, you will mount
> this partition on this mountpoint!' and be done with it.
You can still do this, nothing is preventing you from it.
If you have /home in your fstab by its label, then you must
change this before you insert the other disk. Possibilities :
( to change in /etc/fstab)
- use UUID instead of volume-label -> no conflicts ever
- temporarily relabel your /home
- temporarily use a device node
>
> so tell me then, how would one discern between two partitions with the
> same label?
--
David Balazic
--------------
"Be excellent to each other." - Bill & Ted
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next reply other threads:[~2001-01-17 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-17 11:04 David Balazic [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-18 16:55 Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Balazic
2001-01-18 19:49 ` Tim Fletcher
2001-01-18 16:36 Andries.Brouwer
2001-01-18 11:01 David Balazic
2001-01-18 11:35 ` Tim Fletcher
2001-01-18 13:01 ` Xavier Bestel
2001-01-18 14:03 ` Tim Fletcher
2001-01-17 10:56 David Balazic
2001-01-17 10:48 David Balazic
2001-01-17 23:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-01-18 10:14 ` David Balazic
2001-01-17 10:21 David Balazic
2001-01-17 10:28 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
2001-01-16 22:54 Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 20:35 Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 20:14 Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 20:30 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2001-01-16 21:18 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-01-17 15:33 ` Mike Porter
2001-01-17 16:16 ` James Bottomley
2001-01-17 17:07 ` Craig Ruff
2001-01-18 12:50 ` Peter Samuelson
2001-01-18 17:59 ` idalton
2001-01-18 18:14 ` Peter Samuelson
2001-01-18 20:53 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-18 22:55 ` David Weinehall
2001-01-16 17:39 Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 17:58 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-16 21:11 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-01-17 9:38 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-17 9:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-01-17 10:19 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-01-17 10:02 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-19 1:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-01-17 10:12 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-01-17 23:19 ` Russell King
2001-01-17 19:50 ` Werner Almesberger
2001-01-17 20:43 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-01-18 0:14 ` Tim Fletcher
2001-01-18 0:39 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-01-18 0:59 ` Tim Fletcher
2001-01-18 9:41 ` Helge Hafting
2001-01-16 17:30 Bryan Henderson
2001-01-16 17:04 David Balazic
[not found] <Venkateshr@ami.com>
2001-01-16 16:56 ` Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 19:52 ` John Summerfield
2001-01-16 16:51 Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 17:09 ` Honza Pazdziora
2001-01-16 16:46 Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 16:43 Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 20:01 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2001-01-16 20:37 ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-16 21:01 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-16 21:23 ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-16 23:32 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-01-17 0:05 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2001-01-17 0:42 ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-17 2:14 ` Peter Samuelson
2001-01-17 17:22 ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-17 18:41 ` Douglas Gilbert
2001-01-17 9:45 ` Ishikawa
2001-01-17 15:45 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-01-16 23:51 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2001-01-17 19:22 ` Werner Almesberger
2001-01-17 20:32 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-17 20:46 ` Werner Almesberger
2001-01-17 21:26 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2001-01-16 16:35 Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 17:04 ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-16 17:24 ` Eddie Williams
2001-01-16 18:22 ` Timur Tabi
2001-01-16 19:18 ` Matthew D. Pitts
2001-01-16 19:54 ` Christopher Friesen
2001-01-16 21:04 ` Timur Tabi
2001-01-16 22:51 ` Peter Samuelson
2001-01-16 16:31 Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 16:53 ` Eddie Williams
2001-01-16 19:48 ` John Summerfield
2001-01-16 16:19 Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 16:23 ` Florent Cueto
2001-01-16 16:31 ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-16 16:40 ` Dominik Kubla
2001-01-16 15:49 Venkatesh Ramamurthy
2001-01-16 16:06 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-16 16:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-01-16 16:40 ` Matthias Andree
2001-01-16 16:45 ` Douglas Gilbert
2001-01-16 17:38 ` Malahal Rao Naineni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A657C49.8D556099@uni-mb.si \
--to=david.balazic@uni-mb.si \
--cc=kernel@blackhole.compendium-tech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox