From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:49:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:49:32 -0500 Received: from palrel1.hp.com ([156.153.255.242]:46609 "HELO palrel1.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:49:15 -0500 Message-ID: <3A6772E1.56263536@cup.hp.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:49:05 -0800 From: Rick Jones Organization: the Unofficial HP X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; HP-UX B.11.00 9000/785) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] In-Reply-To: <200101182030.XAA08626@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote: > > Hello! > > > So if I understand all this correctly... > > > > The difference in ACK generation > > CORK does not affect receive direction and, hence, ACK geneartion. I was asking how the semantics of cork interacted with piggybacking ACK's on data flowing the other way. Was I wrong in assuming that the Linux TCP piggybacks ACKs? rick -- ftp://ftp.cup.hp.com/dist/networking/misc/rachel/ these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :) feel free to email, OR post, but please do NOT do BOTH... my email address is raj in the cup.hp.com domain... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/