From: Chris Chabot <chabotc@reviewboard.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tadavis@lbl.gov
Subject: Interface statistics for Bonding bug in 2.4
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 03:56:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A6CF2EB.7EB23951@reviewboard.com> (raw)
I recently upgraded my main server to a 2.4 kernel (2.4.1pre9). This
machine uses 2 3Com 3C905B networkcards, bonded together (using the
bonding module).
When doing a 'ifconfig' the bond0 device shows 0 RX packets, and a valid
# of TX packets. However looking at eth0 / eth1 (the 2 network cards)
they have the just about the same amount of RX packets, so recieving
does apear to be balanced over the two interfaces.
When running this machine on 2.2.16 the interface it does show the
interface statistics accuratly. I also tested this on a clean 2.4.0
kernel, and it had the same bug.
The ifconfig output (note the 0 packets in bond0's RX)
bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:DA:B8:33:0F
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:3655 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:DA:B8:33:0F
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1992 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1828 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x9800
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:DA:B8:33:0F
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1878 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1827 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x9400
Please CC me in any replies since im not subscribed to the kernel list.
-- Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next reply other threads:[~2001-01-22 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-23 2:56 Chris Chabot [this message]
2001-01-22 18:15 ` Interface statistics for Bonding bug in 2.4 Thomas Davis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A6CF2EB.7EB23951@reviewboard.com \
--to=chabotc@reviewboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tadavis@lbl.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox