From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: David Ford <david@linux.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
Subject: Re: NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10]
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:57:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A6DC619.64019749@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101221711560.1309-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <3A6CF5B7.57DEDA11@linux.com> <3A6D2D54.619AFA7E@mandrakesoft.com> <3A6D616F.63EB34A6@linux.com>
David Ford wrote:
>
> > > Do the tulip driver updates address the increasingly common NETDEV timeout
> > > repots?
> >
> > In general you can answer this yourself by reading
> > drivers/net/tulip/ChangeLog.
> >
> > I don't see increasingly common timeout reports.. with which hardware?
> > They are likely on the newer LinkSys 4.1 cards, and there are still
> > problesm with PNIC. Outside of that, other cards should be ok.
>
> I have four machines now that exhibit this problem. Three have in them the
> Linksys card family, similar PCI cards, one is my laptop which I have three
> different cardbus cards but they all use the tulip driver.
>
> In the PCI situation, not all machines using these cards act the same way.
> I got a 10 pack of LNE100TX cards and so far only two out of the batch are doing
> this, they are all the same revision, identical in every way that I've found.
>
> The three cardbus cards are slightly different in numerous ways. For them they
> normally fault with an APM event, an eject/insert cycle via software will reset
> them and a link down/up won't fix it. For the PCI cards most times a link
> down/up cycle will fix them. It's a 2.4 v.s. 2.2 issue, the 2.2 kernels aren't
> exhibiting this error.
Sounds like the PCI PM state is getting mangled. Can you provide a
"lspci -vvv", as root, for each of the three cardbus cards? Make sure
to run lspci when the cards are up and active and working.
> The PCI cards are hard to get into this state, sometimes they'll run millions of
> packets for months on end before they'll burp. Sometimes it'll happen three
> times a night. The amount of traffic doesn't seem to matter, nor does the type
> of traffic.
>
> 00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev 20)
> Subsystem: Netgear FA310TX
If the link is getting lost (which may explain the randomness of the
error), the following patch might help:
http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=103294&group_id=13004
There are still some media fixes that need to be integrated from the
Becker driver, and tested, too.
Also, downloading tulip-diag.c and capturing the register state before
and after the breakage is useful. A useful command line is "tulip-diag
-mmmaaavvveef".
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik | "You see, in this world there's two kinds of
Building 1024 | people, my friend: Those with loaded guns
MandrakeSoft | and those who dig. You dig." --Blondie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-23 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-23 1:13 2.4.1-test10 Linus Torvalds
2001-01-23 3:08 ` 2.4.1-test10 David Ford
2001-01-23 5:04 ` 2.4.1-test10 Derek Wildstar
2001-01-23 7:05 ` 2.4.1-test10 Jeff Garzik
2001-01-23 10:42 ` 2.4.1-test10 Ben Ford
2001-01-23 10:48 ` NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10] David Ford
2001-01-23 10:56 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-23 11:13 ` David Ford
2001-01-23 12:25 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-23 12:36 ` David Ford
2001-01-23 17:57 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2001-01-23 4:37 ` 2.4.1-test10 Marcelo Tosatti
2001-01-23 19:03 ` 2.4.1-test10 Linus Torvalds
2001-01-23 19:27 ` 2.4.1-test10 Andre Hedrick
2001-01-23 17:48 ` 2.4.1-test10 Marcelo Tosatti
2001-01-23 19:38 ` Under 2.4.0 I can mount same partition twice Dan Graham
2001-01-23 20:13 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A6DC619.64019749@mandrakesoft.com \
--to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=david@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox