From: Linda Walsh <law@sgi.com>
To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
Cc: Florin Andrei <florin@sgi.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown...
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:17:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A6E573D.5210644C@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101231625290.11205-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
Mine was actually out of a stock 2.2.17 -- I tried your patch in an attempt
to fix a disk problem - but the disk was just going bad and the slow speeds were
coming from the automatic sector remapping.
pardon my ignorance, but where do you get UDMA-100-66?
Here is the hdparm -i output on 2.4:
/dev/hda:
Model=IBM-DARA-225000, FwRev=SHAOA54A, SerialNo=SQASQ202564
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=3(DualPortCache), BuffSize=418kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=off
DblWordIO=no, OldPIO=2, DMA=yes, OldDMA=2
CurCHS=17475/15/63, CurSects=16513875, LBA=yes, LBAsects=49577472
tDMA={min:120,rec:120}, DMA modes: mword0 mword1 mword2
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, PIO modes: mode3 mode4
UDMA modes: mode0 mode1 *mode2 mode3 mode4
Drive Supports : ATA/ATAPI-4 T13 1153D revision 17 : ATA-1 ATA-2 ATA-3 ATA-4
UDMA mode (2) seems to be identical to before.
Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
> > Linda Walsh wrote:
> > >
> > > The REAL problem was in disk performance. The apm made no difference:
> >
> > Same problem here. I had a huge HDD performance drop when upgrading
> > from 2.2.18 to 2.4.0
> > It's an Intel i815 motherboard, and the HDD is Ultra-ATA.
>
> ER, were you getting UDMA-100-66 out of 2.2.18 stock?
> Now what are you getting in 2.4.0?
--
Linda A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI
law@sgi.com | Voice: (650) 933-5338
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-24 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-23 20:32 2.4 cpu usage LA Walsh
2001-01-23 21:37 ` Barry K. Nathan
2001-01-24 0:06 ` 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown Linda Walsh
2001-01-24 0:15 ` Florin Andrei
2001-01-24 0:26 ` Andre Hedrick
2001-01-24 4:17 ` Linda Walsh [this message]
2001-01-24 5:12 ` Andre Hedrick
2001-01-24 15:54 ` Benson Chow
2001-01-24 16:13 ` Miles Lane
2001-01-24 10:34 ` Barry K. Nathan
2001-01-26 17:18 ` 2.4 cpu usage Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A6E573D.5210644C@sgi.com \
--to=law@sgi.com \
--cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
--cc=florin@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox