From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 02:38:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 02:38:07 -0500 Received: from hermes.mixx.net ([212.84.196.2]:16905 "HELO hermes.mixx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 02:37:51 -0500 Message-ID: <3A6FD7A0.B45964A8@innominate.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:37:04 +0100 From: Juri Haberland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Hansen Cc: Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeremy Hansen wrote: > > Just curious if others have noticed that hotmail is unable to deal with > ECN and wondering if this is a standard that should be encouraged, as in > should I tell hotmail that perhaps they should look into supporting it, or > should I not waste my breath and echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn? Forget it. I mailed them and this is the answer: "As ECN is not a widely used internet standard, and as Cisco does not have a stable OS for their routers that accepts ECN, anyone attempting to access our site through a gateway or from a computer that uses ECN will be unable to do so." Juri -- juri.haberland@innominate.com system engineer innominate AG clustering & security the linux architects tel: +49-30-308806-45 fax: -77 http://www.innominate.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/