From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:08:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:08:31 -0500 Received: from hermes.mixx.net ([212.84.196.2]:35858 "HELO hermes.mixx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:08:14 -0500 Message-ID: <3A708722.C21EC12A@innominate.de> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 21:05:54 +0100 From: Daniel Phillips Organization: innominate X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test10 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? In-Reply-To: <200101251047.QAA16434@vxindia.veritas.com> <20010125164432.A12984@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote: > We also maintain the > per-page buffer lists as caches of the virtual-to-physical mapping to > avoid redundant bmap()ping. Could you clarify that one, please? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/