From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>
To: Shawn Starr <Shawn.Starr@Home.net>
Cc: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>,
Gregory Maxwell <greg@linuxpower.cx>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.xkernels?
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 19:08:42 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A72820A.1488BDC@uow.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <186870000.980100593@tiny> <3A6B6FDE.93AF69CC@Home.net>
Shawn,
I've pretty much completed the low-latency patch against reiserfs.
It seems to be a little more latency-prone than ext2, but under normal
workloads it's not significant. The worst-case is 100 milliseconds,
but that's when you're doing insane things to it.
You may care to apply http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/2.4.1-pre10-low-latency.patch
against 2.4.1-pre10 and see if it "feels" different. I'd be surprised
if it does, but the result would be interresting.
Note that the low-latency capability must be enabled under the
"Processor type and features" menu, and if you also enable the
low-latency sysctl option, you'll need to
echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/lowlatency
to make it happen. Creature feep :)
Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> Sure, but Im not sure what to test ;)
> If you've got any special patches for 2.4 lemme know and I'll apply them I've
> got all night heh
>
> Shawn.
>
> Chris Mason wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, January 20, 2001 02:59:24 PM -0500 Gregory Maxwell
> > <greg@linuxpower.cx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 02:50:16PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > >> It just seems that since using 2.4 ive noticed my poor Pentium 200Mhz
> > >> slow down whether being in X or otherwise. It just seems that the system
> > >> is sluggish.
> > >>
> > >> I am using the new ReiserFS filesystem and I do know its still in heavy
> > >> development perhaps my latency is due to this (?)
> > >
> > > Reiserfs uses much more complex data structures then ext2 (trees..). I
> > > don't think that latency has ever been a design criteria and all of the
> > > benchmarks they use are pretty much pure throughput tests.
> > >
> > > So it wouldn't be really surprising if reiserfs had very bad latency. You
> > > should apply the timepegs patch and profile your kernel latency to see
> > > where it's coming from.
> >
> > I'm actually very interested in fixing any latency problems. If you do
> > these tests, please send the results along.
> >
> > -chris
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-27 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-20 19:50 Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.x kernels? Shawn Starr
2001-01-20 19:59 ` Gregory Maxwell
2001-01-20 20:16 ` Shawn Starr
2001-01-21 18:09 ` Chris Mason
2001-01-21 23:25 ` Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.xkernels? Shawn Starr
2001-01-27 8:08 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2001-01-27 8:04 ` Shawn Starr
2001-01-28 2:55 ` Shawn Starr
2001-01-28 3:29 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-28 3:59 ` Shawn Starr
2001-01-28 19:17 ` Chris Mason
2001-01-29 0:33 ` Shawn Starr
2001-01-28 11:46 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-28 21:53 ` Shawn Starr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A72820A.1488BDC@uow.edu.au \
--to=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
--cc=Shawn.Starr@Home.net \
--cc=greg@linuxpower.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox