From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 10:14:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 10:14:29 -0500 Received: from femail3.rdc1.on.home.com ([24.2.9.90]:57287 "EHLO femail3.rdc1.on.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 10:14:13 -0500 Message-ID: <3A72E5A7.92525EF6@home.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 10:13:43 -0500 From: John Cavan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-ac12 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Ford CC: LKML Subject: Re: spurious IRQ complaints In-Reply-To: <3A728911.E4A02068@linux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Ford wrote: > > PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 01:00.0. Please try > using pci=biosirq. > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 RF > (prog-if 00 [VGA]) > Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 0008 > Flags: bus master, stepping, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 64 > Memory at e4000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M] > I/O ports at d000 [size=256] > Memory at e9000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] > Expansion ROM at e8000000 [disabled] [size=128K] > Capabilities: [50] AGP version 2.0 > Capabilities: [5c] Power Management version 1 > > Does it really need one? DRI versions of X seem to behave better if an IRQ is assigned to the VGA device via the BIOS. Didn't seem like a problem to let it have one, so I did. :o) John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/