From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:34:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:34:34 -0500 Received: from femail3.rdc1.on.home.com ([24.2.9.90]:21177 "EHLO femail3.rdc1.on.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:34:21 -0500 Message-ID: <3A74BA76.B24D032D@Home.net> Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:33:58 -0500 From: Shawn Starr Organization: Visualnet X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.1-pre10a i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Mason CC: Andrew Morton , Shawn Starr , Gregory Maxwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.xkernels? In-Reply-To: <203550000.980709430@tiny> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Andrew Morton > wrote: Ok, I've backed out of the low-latency patch but kept the timepegs patch in. I've applied your reiserfs low-latency patch on a stock 2.4.1-pre11 kernel. Let's see what happens :) Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/