From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:37:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:37:41 -0500 Received: from Huntington-Beach.Blue-Labs.org ([208.179.0.198]:3140 "EHLO Huntington-Beach.Blue-Labs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:37:24 -0500 Message-ID: <3A77966E.444B1160@linux.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:37:02 -0800 From: David Ford Organization: Blue Labs Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.1-pre11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Frost CC: LKML Subject: Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current' undefined) In-Reply-To: <3A777E1A.8F124207@linux.com> <20010130220148.Y26953@ns> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mhm. Is it worth the effort to make a dependancy on the CPU type for SMP? -d Stephen Frost wrote: > * David Ford (david@linux.com) wrote: > > A person just brought up a problem in #kernelnewbies, building an SMP > > kernel doesn't work very well, current is undefined. I don't have more > > time to debug it but I'll strip the config and put it up at > > http://stuph.org/smp-config > > They're trying to compile SMP for Athlon/K7 (CONFIG_MK7=y). -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/