From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:49:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:49:06 -0500 Received: from smtp.mountain.net ([198.77.1.35]:58377 "EHLO riker.mountain.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:48:59 -0500 Message-ID: <3A77ED7F.466582F0@mountain.net> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:48:31 -0500 From: Tom Leete X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0 i486) X-Accept-Language: en-US,en-GB,en,fr,es,it,de,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Samuelson CC: David Ford , Stephen Frost , LKML Subject: Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current' undefined) In-Reply-To: <3A777E1A.8F124207@linux.com> <20010130220148.Y26953@ns> <3A77966E.444B1160@linux.com> <3A77C6E7.606DDA67@mountain.net> <20010131042616.A32636@cadcamlab.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Tom Leete] > > It's not an incompatibility with the k7 chip, just bad code in > > include/asm-i386/string.h. > > So you're saying SMP *is* supported on Athlon? Do motherboards exist? > > Peter No, I'm saying that SMP locking etc. is compatible with Athlon. The failure to build is not a workaround but a coding error. SMP builds for UP machines are supposed to work. Tom -- The Daemons lurk and are dumb. -- Emerson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/