From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:58:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:58:01 -0500 Received: from mail08.voicenet.com ([207.103.0.34]:3003 "HELO mail08") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:57:56 -0500 Message-ID: <3A789869.B05506FB@voicenet.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:57:45 -0500 From: safemode X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19pre7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Tobias Ringstrom , Mark Hahn , David Raufeisen , Vojtech Pavlik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > better than i ever got with 2.4 even when only one drive was on a channel. > > Right now my k7-2 750 is at 849mhz with a FSB of 114Mhz and PCI at 34Mhz. > > Hint: people who overclock machines get suprising odd results and bad stuff > happens. Please dont waste developers time unless you can reproduce it at > the intended speed for the components Like i said .. i just did that within the last 5 min it has nothing to do with any problems i've been talking about - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/