From: safemode <safemode@voicenet.com>
To: Byron Stanoszek <gandalf@winds.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:52:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A78C17A.B06F74FC@voicenet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101311937380.21983-100000@winds.org>
Byron Stanoszek wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, safemode wrote:
>
> > yea i know. . same mode i also had a big problem with DMA timeouts on
> > 2.4 so .. i dont know what's up with 2.4 and my motherboard ... 2.2
> > hasn't shown a single irq or DMA error yet since going back to it.
> > currently 2.2.19-pre7 is using UDMA4 i just flashed the bios today so ..
> > hopefully that should have fixed any problems. I get 24MB/s each according
> > to hdparm -t on my hdd's and both are on the same channel. This is much
> > better than i ever got with 2.4 even when only one drive was on a channel.
> > Right now my k7-2 750 is at 849mhz with a FSB of 114Mhz and PCI at 34Mhz.
> > my nbench performance under 2.2 is comparable to results for 1Ghz t-bird's so
> > i'm happy with 2.2. The only thing that would make me want to upgrade would
> > be latency patches. I'm convinced 2.4 has performance issues so i guess i'll
> > be using 2.2 until 2.5 begins. Is it really only 1 or 2 people having
> > this Via corruption problem? i doubt it's a bios problem because wouldn't
> > 2.2 be effected by a bios bug if 2.4 is? In either case the changelogs dont
> > show any fixes for it.
>
> If your FSB is running at 114 MHz, you should try the kernel parameter
> idebus=37 to get DMA working correctly. Otherwise you'll see an ide-reset error
> on bootup because the instructions are too fast. The VIA driver on 2.2 doesn't
> correctly program the PCI card, so you don't see weird behavior running 2.2
> with a faster PCI clock.
>
> (Note: 1.14 * 33 = 37.6 PCI Clk)
>
> It also matters what motherboard you're using, and if it can support speeds up
> past 100. If you're serious about overclocking, buy one of the new KT133A
> boards that support speeds up to 133 (or an average overclocked 145 limit).
>
> For instance, my Epox KX133 board is unstable at anything above 110 FSB, but
> I've seen the Abit KT7 go as high as 116. You should also have some good
> memory that is rated for 150MHz, otherwise you're just asking for trouble.
My KA7 can go over 160Mhz FSB
Yes i know about memory speed limitions ..that's why you are able to choose
HW clock - PCI so at those high speeds it's actually say 120Mhz - 33
keeping you below or near 100 and not well over the spec of the ram. Anyway i
dont go that high 110 is safe an doesn't cause any heat increase and gives me
100Mhz more. nbench shows my performance about equal to t-bird 1ghz. at least in
memory and integer. The KA7 lets you increase the FSB without increasing the
PCI bus speed, so i dont have to worry about changing ide bus timings, PCI is
still at 33 - 34 not enough to hurt any cards.
>
> As always, if you have problems with the kernel and want to submit a bug
> report, please put all the settings back to normal and test thoroughly before
> continuing. It's funny how many bug reports I've heard from people who've
> overclocked their FSB and expected the IDE DMA to be set appropriately under
> 2.4... maybe this should be mentioned somewhere in ide.txt, even though
> overclocking is frowned upon.
As i mentioned in older emails, i did this _today_ i mentioned this "bug" over
two weeks ago. I turned off DMA in the bios and kernel and the "bug" was still
present. you can read the old emails and see for yourself.
>
> Regards,
> Byron
>
> --
> Byron Stanoszek Ph: (330) 644-3059
> Systems Programmer Fax: (330) 644-8110
> Commercial Timesharing Inc. Email: bstanoszek@comtime.com
OK ok.. just forget i ever mentioned it .. It has nothing to do with anything
i've been talking about problem wise because i _JUST_ did it now ... It is the
cause of nothing because they all happened before i did anything to the speed.
This is a 2.4.x kernel problem. It has nothing to do with overclocking because at
the time i didn't. When i used 2.2.x it did not have any problems and i did not
overclock. As of now i have no problems with ide resets or dma timeouts (which
is what i said before), regardless of if i'm overclocking it now or not. It's
working great (better than great) without changing anyhing in 2.2.19-pre7.
heh. so everyone can stop flipping out over overclocking because i made sure
hardware settings were default failsafe even before deciding it was definitely a
kernel problem and i never had the settings over spec before the problem surfaced.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-01 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101301743180.30535-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-01-31 1:18 ` VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x David D.W. Downey
2001-01-31 2:04 ` David D.W. Downey
2001-01-31 7:36 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-31 7:55 ` David Raufeisen
2001-01-31 9:48 ` safemode
2001-01-31 11:43 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-31 12:54 ` Mark Hahn
2001-01-31 19:58 ` David Riley
2001-02-01 12:51 ` David D.W. Downey
2001-01-31 20:01 ` safemode
2001-01-31 22:04 ` Tobias Ringstrom
2001-01-31 22:40 ` safemode
2001-01-31 22:46 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-31 22:57 ` safemode
2001-02-01 6:31 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-01 0:46 ` Byron Stanoszek
2001-02-01 1:52 ` safemode [this message]
2001-02-01 6:52 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-01 11:32 ` safemode
2001-02-01 16:46 ` Byron Stanoszek
2001-02-01 18:06 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-01 18:20 ` Byron Stanoszek
2001-02-01 20:51 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-01 21:51 ` safemode
2001-02-01 21:56 ` Alan Chandler
2001-02-01 6:39 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-31 11:39 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-31 15:41 ` David D.W. Downey
2001-01-30 13:40 Nicholas Knight
2001-01-30 15:03 ` Tobias Ringstrom
2001-01-30 19:51 ` David D.W. Downey
2001-01-30 20:53 ` David Raufeisen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A78C17A.B06F74FC@voicenet.com \
--to=safemode@voicenet.com \
--cc=gandalf@winds.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox