From: LA Walsh <law@sgi.com>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Power usage Q and parallel make question (separate issues)
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 00:13:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A791A9D.1B2D0EEA@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11659.980998327@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>
Keith Owens wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:02:03 -0800,
> LA Walsh <law@sgi.com> wrote:
> >This seems to serialize the delete, run the mod-installs in parallel, then run the
> >depmod when they are done.
>
> It works, until somebody does this
>
> make -j 4 modules modules_install
---
But that doesn't work now.
> There is not, and never has been, any interlock between make modules
> and make modules_install. If you let modules_install run in parallel
> then people will be tempted to issue the incorrect command above
> instead of the required separate commands.
---
>
> make -j 4 modules
> make -j 4 modules_install
>
> You gain a few seconds on module_install but leave more room for user
> error.
---
A bit of documentation at the beginning of the Makefile would do wonders
for kernel-developer (not end user, please!) clarity. I've oft'asked the question
as to what really is supported. I've tried things like make dep bzImage modules --
I noticed it didn't work fairly quickly. Same with modules/modules_install --
people would probably figure that one out, but just a bit of documentation would
help even that.
--
Linda A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI
law@sgi.com | Voice: (650) 933-5338
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-01 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-31 19:44 Power usage Q and parallel make question (separate issues) LA Walsh
2001-02-01 0:32 ` Keith Owens
2001-02-01 3:02 ` LA Walsh
2001-02-01 3:32 ` Keith Owens
2001-02-01 8:13 ` LA Walsh [this message]
2001-02-01 8:24 ` Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A791A9D.1B2D0EEA@sgi.com \
--to=law@sgi.com \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox