public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: LA Walsh <law@sgi.com>
To: Delta <birtl00@dmi.usherb.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: System unresponsitive when copying HD/HD
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 12:07:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A7C64F9.F3192611@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A7B1129.2ED4CCE4@dmi.usherb.ca>

I've noticed less responsive disk response on 2.4.0 vs. 2.2.17.  For example --
I run vmware and suspend it frequently when I'm not using it.  One of them requires
a 158Mb save file.  Before, I could suspend that one, then start another which
reads in a smaller 50M save file.  The smaller one would come up while the other
was still saving.  As of 2.4, the smaller one doesn't come up -- I can't even do
an 'ls' until the big save finishes.  

Now big image program has actually exited and I can close the window -- the disk
writes are going on from the disk cache with 'kupdate' taking some minor fraction (<1%)
of the CPU and the rest of the system being mostly idle.

If I have vmstat running, I notice blocks trickling out to the disk, 5sec averages
495,142,151,155,136,257,15,0.  Note that the maximum read rate (hdparm -t) of this
disk is in the 12-14M/s range.  I'm getting about 1-5% of that on output with the
system's disk subsystem being apparently unable to do anything else.

This is with IDE hard disk with DMA enabled.

a) is this expected performance on a large linear write?  
b) should I expect other disk operations to be denied service as long as
	the write is 'flushing'?

-l
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-02-03 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-02 19:57 System unresponsitive when copying HD/HD Delta
2001-02-02 20:13 ` Doug McNaught
2001-02-02 20:20 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-02-03 20:07 ` LA Walsh [this message]
2001-02-04 11:01   ` Alan Cox
2001-02-04 19:55     ` LA Walsh
2001-02-05  1:07       ` Jens Axboe
2001-02-05 16:23     ` [PATCH] " Rik van Riel
2001-02-05 16:15   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A7C64F9.F3192611@sgi.com \
    --to=law@sgi.com \
    --cc=birtl00@dmi.usherb.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox