Re: PS hanging in 2.4.1 - HAPPENING NOW!!!

[Shawn Starr <Shawn.Starr@Home.net>]

Ok, ive added change. Im starting the applications that were running at the time of the hang. XMMS, gnomeicu, a few consoles etc.

Let's see what happens.

Shawn.

Shawn Starr wrote:

> Adding now.. I just applied 2.4.1-ac2 and now i'll add this code snipet to the source. It might take 4 days or so for the bug to show itself. At least, unless it triggers eariler (?)
>
> Restarting...
>
> Shawn.
>
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Shawn.Starr@Home.net wrote:
> > >
> > >Feb  3 17:57:08 coredump kernel: gnomeicu  S 0000CD17     0  9338      1        (NOTLB)    9340  9332
> > >Feb  3 17:57:08 coredump kernel: Call Trace: [search_by_key+203/3232] [search_for_position_by_key+170/916] [make_cpu_key+57/64] [_get_block_create_0+136/1072] [_get_block_create_0+162/1072] [remove_wait_queue+40/48] [__wait_on_buffer+128/140]
> > >Feb  3 17:57:08 coredump kernel:        [<f0000000>] [reiserfs_get_block+158/3408] [search_for_position_by_key+170/916] [search_for_position_by_key+570/916] [make_cpu_key+57/64] [kmem_cache_alloc+75/116] [get_unused_buffer_head+52/144] [create_buffers+96/444]
> > >Feb  3 17:57:08 coredump kernel:        [block_read_full_page+246/552] [add_to_page_cache_unique+202/212] [reiserfs_readpage+15/20] [reiserfs_get_block+0/3408] [read_cluster_nonblocking+258/324] [filemap_nopage+332/1032] [do_no_page+77/192] [handle_mm_fault+232/340]
> > >Feb  3 17:57:08 coredump kernel:        [do_page_fault+312/1020] [do_page_fault+0/1020] [start_request+388/508] [intlat_local_irq_disable+16/20] [ide_do_request+685/752] [schedule+639/964] [remove_wait_queue+40/48] [error_code+52/64]
> > >Feb  3 17:57:09 coredump kernel:        [__generic_copy_from_user+52/60] [opost_block+67/384] [handle_mm_fault+232/340] [add_wait_queue+59/68] [write_chan+365/516] [tty_write+341/448] [write_chan+0/516] [sys_write+143/196]
> > >Feb  3 17:57:09 coredump kernel:        [system_call+62/80]
> >
> > Ok, the above seems to be the culprit here.
> >
> > Note how the thing is in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (S) sleep somewhere in the
> > reiserfs code..
> >
> > Debugging this is slightly harder than I'd like, because the "call trace"
> > is really not a trace, but actually just a dump of the stack of everything
> > that looks like a kernel address. And a lot of it is crap - stuff left
> > over by previous calls that hasn't gotten overwritten and is visible
> > because some function has a large stack footprint (lots of local variables
> > that end up not being very used and let things show through).
> >
> > Anyway, what I _think_ is the cleaned-up stacktrace is
> >
> >         [reiserfs_get_block+158/3408]
> >         [reiserfs_readpage+15/20]
> >         [read_cluster_nonblocking+258/324]
> >         [filemap_nopage+332/1032]
> >         [do_no_page+77/192]
> >         [handle_mm_fault+232/340]
> >         [do_page_fault+312/1020]
> >         [error_code+52/64]
> >         [__generic_copy_from_user+52/60]
> >         [opost_block+67/384]
> >         [handle_mm_fault+232/340]
> >         [add_wait_queue+59/68]
> >         [write_chan+365/516]
> >         [tty_write+341/448]
> >         [write_chan+0/516]
> >         [sys_write+143/196]
> >         [system_call+62/80]
> >
> > and what is interesting is that you got a page fault while you were
> > copying stuff in to the tty layer. Which happens with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
> > sleep. Now, the page fault code never clears that, so we enter reiserfs
> > still "sleeping", and reiserfs will do a
> >
> >         if (need_resched(current))
> >                 schedule();
> >
> > which won't do what reiserfs _wants_ it to do at all. Because if
> > task->state is TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, the above will go to sleep, not just
> > cause a nice reschedule. And we'll be sleeping with the task MM semaphore
> > held - only to wake up if somebody were to signal us or something.
> >
> > If you can re-create this hang, could you please try to add this single
> > line to the top of "handle_mm_fault()" in mm/memory.c (after the variable
> > declarations, of course):
> >
> >         current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> >
> > which just means that if we get a page fault while we're half asleep, it
> > will be safe to do a schedule() without explicitly setting the process
> > running again.
> >
> >                 Linus
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/