From: Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Major Clock Drift
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 23:18:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A7D72BB.32D44334@coppice.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102040756120.5276-100000@fd0man.accesstoledo.com>
"Michael B. Trausch" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Josh Myer wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I know this _really_ isn't the forum for this, but a friend of mine has
> > noticed major, persistent clock drift over time. After several weeks, the
> > clock is several minutes slow (always slow). Any thoughts on the
> > cause? (Google didn't show up anything worthwhile in the first couple of
> > pages, so i gave up).
> >
>
> I'm having the same problem here. AMD K6-II, 450 MHz, VIA Chipset, Kernel
> 2.4.1.
If you don't use software time correction a minute a week is not too
bad, by current PC standards. Most Compaqs are off by more like a minute
a day. I have verified with a frequency counter that it is actually the
Compaq crystal oscillator which is at fault. Most motherboards are
better than this, but many are not great. The battery backed CMOS clock
is usually a lot better than the interrupt based one, but still not
great. They don't tweak them up like a watch maker would, even though
they usually use the same type of crystal.
Regards,
Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-04 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-04 4:32 [OT] Major Clock Drift Josh Myer
2001-02-04 4:42 ` Manfred Bartz
2001-02-04 12:56 ` Michael B. Trausch
2001-02-04 15:18 ` Steve Underwood [this message]
2001-02-04 15:31 ` Hacksaw
2001-02-04 23:46 ` Alan Chandler
2001-02-04 17:18 ` Tom Eastep
2001-02-04 18:04 ` Hacksaw
2001-02-04 18:07 ` Tom Eastep
2001-02-05 13:25 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-10 21:58 ` Pavel Machek
2001-02-11 11:05 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-11 11:06 ` Pavel Machek
2001-02-11 11:47 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-11 12:14 ` Peter Horton
2001-02-11 13:52 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-02-05 1:18 ` Michael B. Trausch
2001-02-13 3:00 ` george anzinger
2001-02-13 6:51 ` Josh Myer
2001-02-10 21:58 ` [OT] " Pavel Machek
2001-02-11 17:07 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-11 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-12 9:48 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-12 10:05 ` Andi Kleen
2001-02-12 10:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-12 12:14 ` James Sutherland
2001-02-12 10:32 ` Pavel Machek
2001-02-12 10:36 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-12 11:38 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-13 7:24 ` Abramo Bagnara
2001-02-10 21:55 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A7D72BB.32D44334@coppice.org \
--to=steveu@coppice.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox