From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Thomas Stewart <T.Stewart@student.umist.ac.uk>
Cc: Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>,
Jonathan Morton <chromi@cyberspace.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksa1 <ksa1@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:38:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A7E6670.4AD21D20@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A7D77B5.ABF5A850@colorfullife.com> <3A7DEEB2.20915.276D09D@localhost>
Thomas Stewart wrote:
>
> >
> > CmdReset is not instant, it may need a delay. There is also a "force
> > software reset" operation that sounds good, I assume that one also
> > could use a delay so I gave it 6ms.
> >
6 ms is quite long:
I added a reset into tx_timeout, and that function should not take more
than 1 ms or so.
Did you find something about the delay in the documentation? Is it
possible to poll for reset completion?
I know that the winbond-840 chipset resets in 4 pci cycles - perhaps the
via-rhine is also fast?
>
> I applyed Manfred's patch but that changed nothing.
>
That's expected, my patch fixes another bug.
The NIC now recover from "Tx timeout" messages. ksa confirmed that, but
there is still a delay of a few seconds. I'll try to fix that.
> Then I applyed your patch and still changed nothing as you suspected.
> But there are regs that are different.
>
Did you run via-diag before or after loading the via-rhine module?
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-05 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-04 10:23 d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report) Jonathan Morton
2001-02-04 11:40 ` hjb
2001-02-04 12:14 ` Urban Widmark
2001-02-04 12:35 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-02-04 12:40 ` Urban Widmark
2001-02-04 15:39 ` Manfred
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102042130100.26061-300000@cola.teststation.com>
2001-02-05 0:07 ` Thomas Stewart
2001-02-05 8:38 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2001-02-05 9:26 ` Urban Widmark
2001-02-05 10:41 ` Thomas Stewart
2001-02-05 10:58 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-02-05 19:41 ` Thomas Stewart
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-02-05 14:51 ksa1
2001-02-06 21:15 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-02-04 9:26 ksa1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A7E6670.4AD21D20@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=T.Stewart@student.umist.ac.uk \
--cc=chromi@cyberspace.org \
--cc=ksa1@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urban@teststation.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox