From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@innominate.de>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sync & asyck i/o
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 19:21:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A80408C.E854B37A@innominate.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200102061424.PAA32284@hell.wii.ericsson.net> <E14Q9U2-0005gX-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20010206173437.A19836@redhat.com>
"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 02:52:40PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > According to the man page for fsync it copies in-core data to disk
> > > prior to its return. Does that take async i/o to the media in account?
> > > I.e. does it wait for completion of the async i/o to the disk?
> >
> > Undefined.
>
> > In practice some IDE disks do write merging and small amounts of write
> > caching in the drive firmware so you cannot trust it 100%.
>
> It's worth noting that it *is* defined unambiguously in the standards:
> fsync waits until all the data is hard on disk. Linux will obey that
> if it possibly can: only in cases where the hardware is actively lying
> about when the data has hit disk will the guarantee break down.
Sometimes I want to know that the write is safely on disk and sometimes
I only need to know that the io has gone over the bus and is on its way
to disk. In the latter case the buffer/page can be unlocked a lot
sooner. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the current
API can make that distinction for IDE, much less provide a uniform way
of controlling this behaviour across all types of block devices. We
need that, or else we have to choose between the following: 1) slow 2)
risky.
I'd like to be able to set a bit in the buffer_head that says 'get back
to me when it's on disk' vs 'get back to me when it's hit the bus'.
--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-06 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-06 14:24 sync & asyck i/o Anders Eriksson
2001-02-06 14:52 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-06 17:34 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-02-06 18:00 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-02-06 18:21 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-02-06 17:51 ` Josh Myer
2001-02-06 17:56 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-06 17:54 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-06 18:18 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-02-06 19:25 ` Andre Hedrick
2001-02-06 23:21 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-02-07 0:42 ` Andre Hedrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A80408C.E854B37A@innominate.de \
--to=phillips@innominate.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox