From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@chiara.elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>,
Frank de Lange <frank@unternet.org>,
Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.1, 2.4.2-pre3: APIC lockups
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:18:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A89B2A1.E188AF9A@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010213203553.1931A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
"Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After performing various tests I came to the following workaround for
> APIC lockups which people observe under IRQ load, mostly for networking
> stuff. I believe the test should work in all cases as it basically
> implements a manual replacement for EOI messages. In my simulated
> environment I was unable to get a lockup with the code in place, even
> though I was getting about every other level-triggered IRQ misdelivered.
>
> Please test it extensively, as much as you can, before I submit it for
> inclusion. If you ever get "Aieee!!! Remote IRR still set after unlock!"
> message, please report it to me immediately -- it means the code failed.
>
No messages.
> There is also an additional debugging/statistics counter provided in
> /proc/cpuinfo that counts interrupts which got delivered with its trigger
> mode mismatched. Check it out to find if you get any misdelivered
> interrupts at all.
>
I'm running my default webserver load test, and I get ~40 /second, 92735
total.
bw_tcp says 1.13 MB/sec, that's wire speed.
tcpdump | grep 'sack ' doesn't show unusually many lost packets.
Look promising.
--
Manfred
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-13 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-13 20:13 [patch] 2.4.1, 2.4.2-pre3: APIC lockups Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-02-13 22:18 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2001-02-13 23:20 ` Frank de Lange
2001-02-14 11:38 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-14 12:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-02-14 17:30 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-02-14 17:41 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-02-14 17:47 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A89B2A1.E188AF9A@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
--cc=frank@unternet.org \
--cc=gandalf@wlug.westbo.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=mingo@chiara.elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox