public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Ville Herva <vherva@mail.niksula.cs.hut.fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 06:08:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A8BB89C.581BC524@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010208135606.F2223@viasys.com> <3A8296E3.FC1EE707@redhat.com> <20010208181601.H2223@viasys.com> <20010215125735.C1147@niksula.cs.hut.fi>

Ville Herva wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 06:16:01PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:53:55AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed:
> > > Ville Herva wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It looks like ac6 (which I believe includes the patch you posted) is
> > > > still a no-go with 7892. The boot halts and it just prints this once a
> > > > second:
> > > >
> > > > (SCSI0:0:3:1) Synchronous at 160 Mbyte/sec offset 31
> > > > (SCSI0:0:3:1) CRC error during data in phase
> > > > (SCSI0:0:3:1)   CRC error in intermediate CRC packet
> > >
> > > Check your cables, especially the connector on the card and the drive.  Look
> > > for any possible bent pins.  The message you are seeing is *usually*, but not
> > > always, a legitimate data corruption issue.  It doesn't show up under the
> > > 5.2.1 driver because it limits your Quantum drive to 80MByte/s and that
> > > particular speed doesn't include CRC checking.  On this driver you have to be
> > > running at 160MByte/s before CRC checking is enabled.
> >
> > I checked the cables. I think HP didn't supply proper 160 MB/S capable
> > cables (aren't those the ones with wattlings?). When I forced the drive to
> > 80MB/s from bios, not only did aic7xxx/ac6 work like charm, but the BIOS
> > also found the "missing" MBR. Stupid problem ;).
> 
> Umm, I think I said that too early. I begun to have problem even during
> boot; the scsi bios did recognize the drive, but the bios didn't find the
> boot record. This was completely cured by forcing the drive to 80MB/s mode.
> So I think the cable wasn't Ultra160 capable.
> 
> However, the 2.4.1ac6, 2.4.1ac2 and 2.19pre6 aic7xxx.c still had trouble
> with the drive. I went back to 80MB/s, 40MB/s and even 20MB/s, but that
> still didn't help. 2.4.1* reported time out while waiting for a command and
> would go into an endless loop resetting the bus. 2.2.19pre6 said there was
> an error during the data in phase, but after some coughing it booted up and
> seemed to work quite alright.
> 
> NT4 booted up without and visible problems.
> 
> The HP service guy changed the motherboard (integrated scsi) the cable (to
> another (80MB/s one), and the drive logics, but that didn't help.
> 
> The problems first started after the motherboard was first changed (due to
> separate problem.) The new one had newer bios and scsi bios.
> 
> Anyhow, I just compiled 2.4.1ac13 with Justin Gibbs's aic7xxx, and it does
> not suffer of any problem at 80MB/s.

There was a new aic7xxx driver (version 5.2.3) that went into the 2.4.1ac
kernel series around 2.4.1-ac7.  I would be curious to know if it worked on
your machine properly.

-- 

 Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>  http://people.redhat.com/dledford
      Please check my web site for aic7xxx updates/answers before
                      e-mailing me about problems

  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-15 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-08 11:56 Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6 Ville Herva
2001-02-08 12:53 ` Doug Ledford
2001-02-08 16:16   ` Ville Herva
2001-02-15 10:57     ` Ville Herva
2001-02-15 11:08       ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2001-02-15 11:22         ` Ville Herva
2001-02-15 12:11           ` Ville Herva
2001-02-16 11:40             ` Ville Herva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A8BB89C.581BC524@redhat.com \
    --to=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vherva@mail.niksula.cs.hut.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox