From: Samuel Flory <sflory@valinux.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "tytso@valinux.com" <tytso@valinux.com>
Subject: mke2fs and kernel VM issues
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:43:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A8C85B9.610D0C06@valinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102151634380.16783-100000@ns-01.hislinuxbox.com>
What is believed to be the current status of the typical mke2fs
crashes/hangs due to vm issues? I can reliably reproduce the issue on a
heavily modifed VA kernel based on 2.2.18. Is there a kernel which is
believed to be a known good kernel? (both 2.2.x and 2.4.x)
Failure pattern:
System:
mylex raid 5 array 8 x 9G drives (not really all that big)
>=512M of RAM (1G of RAM works)
no swap (Not sure if this makes a difference.)
The system is attempting to create a single partition containing the
most of the entire RAID array.
errors:
buffy: Installing with LIVE AMMO
Creating partitions...
Initializing filesystems...
Out of Memory: Killed process 106 (portmap), saved process 2165
(mke2fs).<3>Out
of Memory: Killed process 2123 (buffy), saved process 2165
(mke2fs).willow: LOAD
FAILED
<3>Out of Memory: Killed process 195 (sisyphus_upload), saved process
2165 (mke2
fs).<3>Out of Memory: Killed process 2165 (mke2fs).
(Note that most of the above proccesses were dialog interfaces waiting
for user input or perl scripts waiting for mke2fs or buffy to exit.)
PS- Conversations with various VA empolyees indicates that others within
VA, and at least one vendor are seeing hangs while creating really large
filesystems on RAID arrays. (mostly 1/4 TB or larger) These issues
appear to come and go, and are endemic to the 2.2.x kernel line. Both
lnz and tytso seem to believe the issues to be vm entirely related.
--
Solving people's computer problems always
requires more hardware be given to you.
(The Second Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Samuel J. Flory <sam@valinux.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-16 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-16 0:38 [OTP] SMP board recommendations? David D.W. Downey
2001-02-16 1:43 ` Samuel Flory [this message]
2001-02-16 9:48 ` mke2fs and kernel VM issues Alan Cox
2001-02-16 12:44 ` tytso
2001-02-16 12:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-19 15:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-02-16 19:01 ` Samuel Flory
2001-02-16 11:05 ` Tigran Aivazian
2001-02-16 19:01 ` Samuel Flory
2001-02-16 5:03 ` [OTP] SMP board recommendations? David D.W. Downey
2001-02-16 6:27 ` Andre Hedrick
2001-02-16 10:49 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A8C85B9.610D0C06@valinux.com \
--to=sflory@valinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@valinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox