Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com>]

Martin Mares wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> > True.  Note too, though, that on a filesystem (which we are, after all,
> > talking about), if you assume a large linear space you have to create a
> > file, which means you need to multiply the cost of all random-access
> > operations with O(log n).
> 
> One could avoid this, but it would mean designing the whole filesystem in a
> completely different way -- merge all directories to a single gigantic
> hash table and use (directory ID,file name) as a key, but we were originally
> talking about extending ext2, so such massive changes are out of question
> and your log n access argument is right.
> 

It would still be tricky since you have to have actual files in the
filesystem as well.

	-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt