From: Justin Thomas <justin@jdthomas.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Pottential Problem
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:15:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A9A10B4.70106@jdthomas.net> (raw)
I've been receiving messages in my logs regarding a reiserfs partition I
have on my system. At first, I thought that one of my drives was going
bad, so I really didn't pay it much attention. Now that I look closer,
however, I notice this:
Feb 26 00:02:39 JTLinux kernel: hdb: drive not ready for command
Feb 26 00:02:52 JTLinux kernel: hdb: lost interrupt
Feb 26 00:02:53 JTLinux kernel: hdb: status error: status=0x58 {
DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
Feb 26 00:02:53 JTLinux kernel: hdb: drive not ready for command
Feb 26 00:02:54 JTLinux kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device
Feb 26 00:02:54 JTLinux kernel: 03:41: rw=0, want=584642676, limit=8255488
Feb 26 00:02:54 JTLinux kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device
Feb 26 00:03:05 JTLinux kernel: 03:41: rw=0, want=596901940, limit=8255488
Feb 26 00:03:05 JTLinux kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device
Feb 26 00:03:05 JTLinux kernel: 03:41: rw=0, want=584642676, limit=8255488
. . . These messages are repeated a whole lot . .
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Feb 26 00:06:07 JTLinux kernel: hdb: lost interrupt
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: is_tree_node: node level 30742 does not
match to the expected one 1
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format
found in block 8899. Fsck?
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o
failure occurred trying to find stat data of [10 168 0x0 SD]
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: vs-13048: reiserfs_iget: bad_inode. Stat
data of (10 168) not found
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux last message repeated 5 times
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: hdb: status error: status=0x58 {
DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: hdb: drive not ready for command
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: is_tree_node: node level 30742 does not
match to the expected one 1
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format
found in block 8899. Fsck?
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o
failure occurred trying to find stat data of [10 169 0x0 SD]
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: vs-13048: reiserfs_iget: bad_inode. Stat
data of (10 169) not found
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux last message repeated 5 times
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: is_tree_node: node level 30742 does not
match to the expected one 1
Feb 26 00:06:08 JTLinux kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format
found in block 8899. Fsck?
Feb 26 00:06:09 JTLinux kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o
failure occurred trying to find stat data of [10 170 0x0 SD]
Feb 26 00:06:09 JTLinux kernel: vs-13048: reiserfs_iget: bad_inode. Stat
data of (10 170) not found
_________________
Now, the statement that says: want=596901940, limit=8255488 worries me.
This is an 8.4gig Western Digital drive, so the number, 8255488 seems
reasonable enough. The number 596901940 seems totally unreasonable. Do
you think I am looking at a hardware problem, or do you think it could
be kernel related? I am using kernel 2.4.1 on a SuSE Linux 7.0 system.
Thanks in advance,
Justin
reply other threads:[~2001-02-26 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A9A10B4.70106@jdthomas.net \
--to=justin@jdthomas.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox