public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: James Lewis Nance <jlnance@intrex.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	brian jenkins <bjenkins@thresholdnetworks.com>,
	dave hecht <dhecht@thresholdnetworks.com>,
	Nikita Danilov <god@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: What is 2.4 Linux networking performance like compared to BSD?
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 21:38:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A9E972D.CEA149B0@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A9D891C.434E3AA7@namesys.com> <20010301121554.A861@bessie.dyndns.org>

James Lewis Nance wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:26:20AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > I have a client that wants to implement a webcache, but is very leery of
> > implementing it on Linux rather than BSD.
> >
> > They know that iMimic's polymix performance on Linux 2.2.* is half what it
> > is on BSD.  Has the Linux 2.4 networking code caught up to BSD?
> >
> > Can I tell them not to worry about the Linux networking code strangling their
> > webcache product's performance, or not?
> 
> Hi Hans,
>     I dont have an answer for you, but it would be nice to know the answer.
> Would it be difficult to measure this?  It should not be difficult to make
> a machine dual boot Linux and BSD, and then we can measure the differences.
> If there is a significant performance difference either way then we can
> try and investigate it to see why.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim

This is indeed what we should do if we get no answer from the list by someone
who has already done such work.

Hans

  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-01 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-28 23:26 What is 2.4 Linux networking performance like compared to BSD? Hans Reiser
2001-03-01  4:25 ` Todd
2001-03-01 16:03   ` Hans Reiser
2001-03-01 17:04     ` Nathan Dabney
2001-03-01 18:36       ` Hans Reiser
2001-03-01 19:16         ` David Weinehall
2001-03-01 19:19         ` Alan Cox
2001-03-02  4:57           ` David L. Parsley
2001-03-01 19:22         ` Nathan Dabney
2001-03-02  9:02         ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-03-02 13:00           ` Gregory Maxwell
2001-03-05  8:09             ` Re[2]: " linuxjob
2001-03-02 14:28           ` Alan Cox
2001-03-01 17:17     ` God
2001-03-01 18:04   ` Lincoln Dale
2001-03-01 10:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-03-01 17:15 ` James Lewis Nance
2001-03-01 18:38   ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2001-03-01 19:25     ` Tigran Aivazian
2001-03-01 23:30       ` Hans Reiser
2001-03-01 20:26 ` kuznet
2001-03-02  3:05 ` linuxjob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A9E972D.CEA149B0@namesys.com \
    --to=reiser@namesys.com \
    --cc=bjenkins@thresholdnetworks.com \
    --cc=dhecht@thresholdnetworks.com \
    --cc=god@namesys.com \
    --cc=jlnance@intrex.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox