From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ? (No
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 22:40:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AA71B5C.5AD8661E@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E14adVH-0000wL-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I'm not arguing it was a smart thing to do, but I would think that the
> > fs/kernel/driver writers could keep really nasty and un-expected things
> > from happenning. For instance, the driver could dis-allow any new (non-hdparm)
>
> Like stopping root from using rm -r ? Where is the line drawn
rm -r does not do un-expected things, and it does not corrupt your file
system, it merely removes it. That is the only thing it does, and it
does it every time.
However, messing with the hdparms options can do random things, at
least from my perspective as a user: It may bring exciting new performance
to your system, and it may subtly, or not so, corrupt your file system.
If the drivers can detect what type of HD/chipset we are using, surely
it can know not to allow the user to do stupid things that are out of
spec w/regards to the hardware?
For the power/insane user, there could be a --really-do-stupid-thing-i-told-you-to
option, and it should be that hard to type!!
Ben
--
Ben Greear (greearb@candelatech.com) http://www.candelatech.com
Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com 4444 (Released under GPL)
http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-08 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-05 5:21 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ? (No such file or directory)) Frédéric L. W. Meunier
2001-03-06 6:49 ` Ben Greear
2001-03-06 12:07 ` 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ? (No Alan Cox
2001-03-07 3:54 ` Ben Greear
2001-03-07 12:57 ` Alan Cox
2001-03-08 5:40 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2001-03-08 5:34 ` Alexander Viro
2001-03-08 6:32 ` 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ?(No Ben Greear
2001-03-08 6:21 ` Alexander Viro
2001-03-08 20:30 ` God
2001-03-08 21:31 ` Alexander Viro
2001-03-08 20:10 ` God
2001-03-08 20:37 ` Andre Hedrick
2001-03-08 21:04 ` Roman Zippel
2001-03-08 20:34 ` 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ? (No Oliver Xymoron
2001-03-07 13:49 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-03-06 10:14 ` 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ? (No such file or directory)) SteveC
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AA71B5C.5AD8661E@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox